2026:JHHC:29543 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 9221 of 2026 Kamruddin Ansari, aged about 21 years, son of Late Mohammad Ali @ Late Chunna Ansari, resident of Village Kapsa, P.O. Gopibandh, P.S. Sarath, District Deoghar, Jharkhand. … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opp. Party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Arvind Kumar Choudhary, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Vineet Kumar Vashistha, Advocate --- 05/1st October 2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No. 88 of 2026 registered for offence under Sections 111 (2) (b), 111 (3), 111(4), 319 (2), 318 (4), 338, 336 (3), 340 (2), 61 (2) and 3 (5) of B.N.S. 2023 and Section 66B, 66C, 66D and 84 (C) of I.T. Act, now pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge – II – cum –Special Judge, Cyber Crime Cases, Deoghar. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 11.06.2026 having no criminal antecedent and charge-sheet has already been submitted. One mobile phone and one SIM Cards are alleged to have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. One victim has been identified, who is alleged to have been defrauded to the extent of Rs. 1,00,999/-. The co-accused, namely, Wasim Ansari has been granted bail by this Court in B.A. No. 8257 of 2026 vide order dated 30.09.2026 and another co-accused, namely, Abdul Karim Ansari has also been granted bail by this Court in B.A. No. 9309/2026. 3. Learned counsel for the opposite party though has opposed the prayer for bail, but does not dispute the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. However, he submits that since the 2026:JHHC:29543 2 victim has been identified, which is linked to the mobile of the petitioner through IMEI number, therefore the petitioner be directed to deposit the defrauded amount as a condition for bail. 4. To this, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is ready to deposit the alleged defrauded amount without prejudice to their contention at the stage of trial. 5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that the charge-sheet has already been submitted and that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty-Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge – II – cum – Special Judge, Cyber Crime Cases, Deoghar in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No. 88 of 2026, subject to the following conditions: - (i) The petitioner would deposit Rs. 1,00,999/- before the learned court, which is the alleged defrauded amount linked with the identified victim. (ii) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (iii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iv) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (v) The petitioner would deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his Mobile Number before the learned court below, which he shall not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (vi) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below. 2026:JHHC:29543 3 6. The learned court shall call for the antecedent report of the petitioner before enlarging him on bail and if any criminal antecedent is found, the petitioner shall not be enlarged on bail. 7. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 8. Let a copy of this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through ‘e- mail/FAX’. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Dated: 01.10.2026 Uploaded On: 01.10.2026 Mukul/-