1 CGHC010266962026 2026:CGHC:29931 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 6284 of 2026 Shyamdev Maravi S/o- Ramcharan Maravi Aged About 35 Years R/o- Village - Basantpur, P.S. Basantpur, District - Balrampur-Ramanujganj, (C.G.) ... Applicant versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through- S.H.O. P.S.- Basantpur, District – Balrampur- Ramanujganj, C.G. ---- Non-applicant For Applicant : Mr. Pushkar Sinha, Advocate. For Non-applicant/State : Ms. Nupur Trivedi, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice Order on Board 15.07.2026 1. The applicant has preferred this First Bail Application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of regular bail, as he has been arrested in connection with Crime No. 64/2026, registered at Police Station – Basantpur, District – Balrampur- Ramanujganj (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 109(1) of the BNS. 2. The case of the prosecution, is that the complainant Mehilal Neti lodged report at Police Station Basantpur, that he had gone to Murkoul Market with his friend Mandev and after returned back to home, Mandev asked his elder brother applicant/accused Shayamdev Maravi for allegedly slaughtered and consumed his domestic chicken without his permission. On this issue an altercation and physical scuffle ensued between them, when the complainant intervened, applicant/accused allegedly assaulted him with a Axe on his waist after accusing him of RAJSHEKHAR SONI Digitally signed by RAJSHEKHAR SONI 2 supporting Mandev, causing a bleeding injury. The injured was taken to CHC Wadrafnagar for treatment. On the basis of the said report, FIR registered under station 109 (1) of B.N.S. Hence, this application. 3. It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case and the charge- sheet has been filed in this case. The applicant is said to have assaulted the injured with an axe on his waist and though the surgery was suggested to the injured, but no any surgery has been executed. The applicant is in jail since 21.04.2026 and trial is likely to take quite long time for its conclusion, therefore, he prays for grant of bail. 4. On the other hand, the learned State counsel opposes the bail application and submits that the charge-sheet has been filed in this case. It is further submitted that the applicant is said to have assaulted the injured due to which he has sustained some injuries on his person, therefore, he is not entitled for grant of bail. 5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused all of the documents available on record. 6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, nature and gravity of allegation levelled against the applicant and the fact that charge-sheet has been filed against the applicant, further the applicant is said to have assaulted the injured with an axe on his waist and though the surgery was suggested to the injured, but no any surgery has been executed, the applicant is in jail since 21.04.2026 and conclusion of the trial is likely to take some time, I am inclined to allow this application. 3 7. Let applicant – Shyamdev Maravi, involved in Crime No. 64/2026, registered at Police Station – Basantpur, District – Balrampur- Ramanujganj (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 109(1) of the BNS, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties in the like sum to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law. (ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 269 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. (iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence, proclamation under Section 84 of BNSS. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 209 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. (iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 351 of BNSS. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law. 8. Office is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information and compliance forthwith. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Rajshekhar