Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27339 (MAD)

Chandrasekaran v. The Superintendent of Police

CRL OP/11490/2026 · 2026-06-01

M Nirmal Kumar

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP No. 11490 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 01-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M. NIRMAL KUMAR CRL OP No. 11490 of 2026 Chandrasekaran S/o. Iyamperumal, No.63, Janakiraman Street, Perungappur, Gingee, Villupuram District-604 202. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Superintendent of Police Office of the Superintendent, Villupuram - 605 602. 2. The Inspector of Police All Women Police Station (AWPS), Gingee, Villupuram District-604 202. 3. V. Sri Bhavani W/o. C. Kalanthi, No.114/1A, Selam Main Road, Ulundurpet, Kallakurichi District - 606 107. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: The criminal original petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS to direct the 2nd Respondent Police not to harass the Petitioner without due process of law and pass such other suitable orders as this Honorable Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and thus render justice. For Petitioner(s): Mr.K.Kathiresan For Respondent(s): Mr.A.Amarnath Government Advocate (Crl.side) For R1 And R2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 11490 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 ORDER This criminal original petition has been filed to direct the 2nd Respondent Police not to harass the Petitioner. 2.It is seen, in this case, the petitioner is the father-in-law of the third respondent/defacto complainant. Due to family dispute between them, the third respondent lodged a complaint, which was assigned CSR No.150 of 2026. Pursuant thereto, the petitioner was called for enquiry. He appeared for enquiry before the 2nd respondent police, thereafter, according to the petitioner, under the guise of complaint, he was harassed and forced to arrive at settlement with the third respondent. 3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the first and second respondent submitted that the petitioner appeared for enquiry and undertook to appear again. Thereafter, he had not appeared and filed this petition. 4.Considering that the dispute is a family dispute. This Court is of the view that if the presence of the petitioner is required for enquiry, summons to be issued for his appearance. In any event, the enquiry in CSR No.150 of 2026 will be completed within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 11490 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 5. In view of the above, the criminal original petition is disposed of. 01-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No sms To 1. The Superintendent of Police Office of the Superintendent, Villupuram - 605 602. 2. The Inspector of Police All Women Police Station (AWPS), Gingee, Villupuram District-604 202. 3. The Public Prosecutor High Court, Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 11490 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J. sms CRL OP No. 11490 of 2026 01-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis