2026:JHHC:29214-DB 1 Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 1252 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 1252 of 2026 Jakariya @ Md. Jakir Hussain aged about 39 years, son of Md. Akbar Ali ... ... ... ... ... Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand … … ... Respondent --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAM SHARMA --------- For the Appellant: Mr. Raja Ravi Shekhar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent: Addl.P.P. --------- 02/Dated: 29.09.2026 Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned Addl.P.P. for the State. This appeal is directed against the order dated 08.09.2026 passed in B.P. No. 197 of 2026 by the learned District and Additional Sessions Judge-I, Rajmahal in connection with Rajmahal P.S. Case No. 52 of 2024, whereby and whereunder, the prayer for bail of the appellant has been rejected. It has been alleged that one Md. Imran Sk was apprehended by the police and from his motor cycle Rs. 50,500/- fake currency notes were recovered. Submission has been advanced by the learned counsel for the appellant that the apprehended accused Md. Imran Sk had disclosed that the fake currency notes were planted on his motor cycle by one Hakim Sheikh with whom he had a land dispute and the said Hakim Sheikh has been granted bail by the learned court below. It has been submitted that the appellant has been implicated only on account of the statement of Imran Sheikh that the appellant was found in the company of Hakim Sheikh. Learned counsel adds that the appellant is in custody since 23.07.2026. Learned Addl. P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for bail of the appellant. It appears though the recovery was effected from the motor cycle of Md. Imran Sk but on his disclosure Hakim Sheikh was made an accused and 2026:JHHC:29214-DB 2 Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 1252 of 2026 so far as the present appellant is concerned he has been implicated on the suspicion that he is an accomplice of Hakim Sheikh. Admittedly, there is no recovery from the possession of the appellant. Regard being had to the manner of implication of the appellant, we while setting aside the order dated 08.09.2026 passed in B.P. No. 197 of 2026 arising out of Rajmahal P.S. Case No. 52 of 2024, direct the appellant, named above, to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned District and Additional Sessions Judge-I, Rajmahal in connection with Rajmahal P.S. Case No. 52 of 2024 This appeal is allowed. (Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.) (Ram Sharma, J.) Dated: 29.09.2026 MM/ Cp-03 Uploaded on 01/10/2026