YADAGIRI YELLAR MADHAVA MURALI KRISHNA v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
CRLP/13154/2025 · 2026-01-01
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 27322 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 27322 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010691352025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 13154/2025 Between:
1. YADAGIRI YELLAR MADHAVA MURALI KRISHNA, S/O YADAGIRI SANYASI RAO, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS.
OCCUPATION BANK EMPLOYEE, R/O D.NO. 4-420, KAPU STREET, KONDAKARLA VILLAGE ATCHUTAPURAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, THROUGH S.H.O, ATCHUTAPURAM POLICE STATION
KURNOOL, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, AMARAVATHI.
2. BODDAPU JOGINAIDU, ,S/O. LATE TATALU, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS,R/O KONDAKARLA VILLAGE,
ATCHUTAPURAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:
1. VIJAYA KUMAR SATA Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court Made the Following Order:
The instant Criminal Petition under Section 528 of BNSS has been filed, by the Petitioner/A1, seeking to quash the proceedings against him in C.C.No.2067 of 2021 on the file of the learned Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Yellamanchili.
2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor representing the respondent No.1/State.
2
3. A perusal of the material on record goes to show that there are specific allegations against the petitioner, that the petitioner/A1, along with A2, attacked respondent No.2, as a result of which he sustained injuries. It is evident from the charge sheet, coupled with the wound certificate, that respondent No.2 suffered injuries. Such being the case, this is not a fit case for quashment.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petition may be disposed of dispensing with the presence of the petitioner before the trial Court and by giving liberty to the petitioner to raise such
contentions before the trial Court in defence.
5. Considering the submissions made, the criminal petition is
disposed of and the petitioner is at liberty to raise the present contentions before the trial Court in his defence and the learned trial Judge may take appropriate decision over the matter at appropriate time in accordance with law. However, the presence of the Petitioner herein before the trial Court is dispensed with, except on the specific dates as directed by the trial Court. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________________ Dr. VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 02.01.2026 Asr
3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Crl.P.No.13154 of 2025
Dt.02.01.2026
Asr