Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27319 (AP)

Remella Harish v. THE STATE OF AP

CRLP/13282/2025 · 2026-01-01

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010690922025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 13282/2025 Between: 1. REMELLA HARISH, S/O LATE VENKATA SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,R/O 3-32, RAMALAYAM STREET, VEERAVARAM, KADIAM,EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI, NELAPADU, AMARAVATI,GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KADIAM POLICE STATION, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. CHOPELLA BABY RANI ALIAS JANSI, W/O SELIN CHAKRAVARTHI, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,R/O GANESH NAGAR, MORAMPUDI, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM,RATHI CHERUVU PETA, BIKKAVOLU VILLAGE AND MANDAL,EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. CHOPELLA SATYA HEMANTH, S/O SELIN CHAKRAVARTHI, AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS,R/O GANESH NAGAR, MORAMPUDI, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM,RATHI CHERUVU PETA, BIKKAVOLU VILLAGE AND MANDAL,EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5. JONNAKUTIKRUPA SEKHAR, S/O ABBULU, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS,R/O CHRISTIAN PETA, KOVVUR VILLAGE AND MANDAL,EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 6. BEJYJANKO PARAMJYOTHI, W/O MADUGULU, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS,R/O BIKKAVOLU VILLAGE AND MANDAL,EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1. AKULA SRI KRISHNA SAI BHARGAV 2 Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court Made the Following Order: The instant petition under Section 528 of BNSS, has been filed by the petitioner herein/Defacto complainant seeking a direction to dispose of Crl.M.P.No.2301 of 2025 in C.C. NO.962 of 2025 as expeditiously as possible. 2. Heard Sri A.S.K.S.Bhargav, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor representing the State. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner herein is the de facto complainant and has filed Crl.M.P. No.2301 of 2025 in C.C. No.962 of 2025 on the file of the learned VII Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Rajamahendravaram. Learned counsel would further submit that the said petition was filed seeking interim custody of cash and gold articles, and that the said application is presently pending before the Court. Hence, learned counsel prays for a direction to the trial Court to dispose of the interim application as expeditiously as possible 4. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 5. Considering the submissions made, and since the petitioner herein is the de facto complainant who has moved an application seeking interim custody of the articles, the learned trial Judge is directed to look into the grievance of the petitioner and dispose of the interim application as 3 expeditiously as possible, without granting further adjournments in a casual manner on mere asking. 6. With the above directions, the Criminal Petition is disposed of. 7. Registry is directed to communicate this order forthwith. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date : 02.01.2026 ASR 4 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Crl.P.No.13282 of 2025 Dt.02.01.2026 Asr