2026:JHHC:29525 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8742 of 2026 Suraj Kumar Thakur @ Suraj Thakur, aged about 23 years, S/o Ajay Kumar Thakur, resident of Near Shiv Mandir, Tekwadih, P.O. & P.S. Bishnugarh, District Hazaribagh, Jharkhand-825312 … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opp. Party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. A. K. Rashidi, Advocate Mr. Afaque Rashidi, Advocate Md. Azam, Advocate Ms. Sushmita Kumari, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Vishwanath Roy, Advocate --- 03/1st October 2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with Cyber Case No. 47/2026 (CID Cyber P.S. Case No. 141/2025) for the offence registered under Sections 318(2), 318(3), 318(4), 319(2), 336(2), 336(3), 338, 340(2), 61(2) of BNS and Sections 66(B), 66(C), 66(D) of IT Act, now said to have been pending in the court of learned AJC-II-cum-Special Judge, Cyber Crime, Ranchi. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the bail application of the petitioner was rejected earlier by this Court in B.A. No. 6043 of 2026 vide order dated 23.07.2026. However, with respect to the money transaction, so far as it relates to the credit in the bank account of the petitioner is concerned, the petitioner has entered into compromise with the informant of the case and has made payment of Rs. 2,50,000/- by demand draft. A copy of the demand draft has been placed on record at page no. 29 of the bail application. The petitioner is in custody since 18.03.2026, charge has already been framed and there is no likelihood of tampering with any evidence as the entire case rests on electronic evidence. 2026:JHHC:29525 2 3. Learned counsel for the opposite party has opposed the prayer for bail. However, the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, based on materials placed on record, are not in dispute. 4. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the custody of the petitioner since 18.03.2026 and the fact that the charge has already been framed, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty-Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned AJC- II-cum-Special Judge, Cyber Crime, Ranchi in connection with Cyber Case No. 47/2026 (CID Cyber P.S. Case No. 141/2025), subject to the following conditions: - (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner would deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his Mobile Number before the learned court below, which he shall not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below. 5. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 6. Let a copy of this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through ‘e- mail/FAX’. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Dated: 01.10.2026 Uploaded On: 01.10.2026 Mukul/-