Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27316 (JHR)

AFZAL AMAN @BABUR @ BIRAT KOHLI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./9044/2026 · 2026-09-28

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:29120 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.9044 of 2026 ------ Afzal Aman @ Babur @ Birat Kohli, aged about 30 years, S/o Late Irasad Alam @ Tulu Khan, R/o Kamarkhadumi Road, Lala Tola, Wasseypur, P.O. + P.S.-Bank More, Dhanbad, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Priyanshu Nilesh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Pankaj Kumar, P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 28-09-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Chirkunda P.S. Case No. 121 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 111(3), 308(3), 308(4), 62, 61(2) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 25(1-B)(a), 25(6), 26(2), 35 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner being a member of an organized gang of criminals, was in illegal possession of arms and ammunitions in an organized manner. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that the arms were seized from the house of Gayasuddin Ansari on the disclosure made by the Rizwan Siddiqui. It is also submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner is one of the persons associated with the said occurrence. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 20.07.2026 as mentioned in para-14 of the instant bail application. It is then submitted that the co-accused has already been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 14.08.2026 in B.A. No.7632 of 2026. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad in connection with Chirkunda P.S. Case No. 121 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 28/09/2026 Abhiraj/