- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34422 WP No. 20355 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 20355 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. M. MUNIKRISHNAPPA S/O LATE MUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, R/AT NO.39, 3RD MAIN ROAD, HOSAHALLI COLONY, VIJAYANAGAR, BENGALURU-560040. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VINAY SWAMY C., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA, DEPARTMENT OF LAND REVENUE, REPRESENTED BY IT'S SECRETARY, VIKASA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560001. 2. THE THASILDAR, NELAMANGALA TALUK, NELAMANGALA, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-562123. 3. SRI. HUCHHAIAH, S/O LATE CHIKKANARASAIAH, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, R/AT MANTANAKURCHI VILLAGE, Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34422 WP No. 20355 of 2026 KASABA HOBLI, NELAMANGALA TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL-562130. 4. SRI. CHANDRAIAH, S/O LATE OBALAIAH, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/AT MANTANAKURCHI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, NELAMANGALA TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL-562123. 5. SRI. MUDDUAH S/O LATE MARA YALLAGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS, R/AT MANTANAKURCHI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, NELMANGALA TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL-562130. 6. SRI. KRISHNAPPA S/O LATE PUTTAIAH, AGED ABOUT 82 YEARS, R/AT MANTANAKURCHI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, NELAMANGALA TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL-562130. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B.P. RADHA, AGA FOR R1 AND R2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY RESPONDENT NO.2 DATED 07.12.2024 IN THNL- ADMSOLRF/308/2023-SEC AD-1 TAHSILDAR OFFICE NELMANGALA i.e ANNEXURE-E AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34422 WP No. 20355 of 2026 ORAL ORDER Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for respondents No.1 and 2. 2. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and on careful examination, the impugned order at Annexure-E passed by respondent No.2 is an appealable order under Section 136(2) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964. 3. In that view of the matter, reserving liberty to the petitioner to approach the competent authority as required under law, I am of the view that, the writ petition is not maintainable. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE MCR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 34