Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27312 (JHR)

PRATIK SHARMA v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cont.(Cvl)/464/2022 · 2026-09-21

Deepak Roshan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:29117 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (C). No. 464 of 2022 --------- Pratik Sharma, aged about 28 years, son of Shri Kamlesh Sharma, resident of House No. 73, Dimna Road, Near Hera Hotel, P.O. & P.S. Mango, Dist. East Singhbhum, Jharkhand. … Petitioner Versus 1. State of Jharkhand. 2. Sukhdeo Singh, Chief Secretary, Govt. of Jharkhand, Project Bhawan, P.O. Jagannathpur, P.S. Dhurwa, Dist. Ranchi, Jharkhand; 3. L. Khiangte, Additional Chief Secretary, Forest, Environment and Climate Change Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, Secretariat, Nepal House, P.O. & P.S. Doranda, Dist. Ranchi, Jharkhand; 4. Shashikar Samanta, Chairman, Jharkhand State Pollution Control Board, HEC, Dhurwa, P.O. Jagannathpur, P.S. Dhurwa, Dist. Ranchi, Jharkhand; 5. Sandeep Lakra, Joint Secretary, Govt. of Jharkhand, Project Bhawan, P.O. Jagannathpur, P.S. Dhurwa, Dist. Ranchi, Jharkhand; 6. Priyesh Kumar Verma, the then Principal Chief Conservator of Forest & Head of Forest Force, Forests, Environment and Climate Change Department, having office at Van Bhavan, P.O. & P.S. Doranda, Dist. Ranchi, Jharkhand. …. Opp. Parties ---------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN For the Petitioner : Mr. Rakesh Kr. Roy, Advocate For the Opp. Parties : Mr. Rahul Saboo, Advocate Mr. Kunal Chandra Suman, Advocate ----------- 24/ 21.09.2026 Having regard to the supplementary show-cause dated 12.08.2026, no contempt is made-out. 2. Accordingly, the instant application stands dismissed. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 21st September, 2026 kunal/- Uploaded 29.09.2026