Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010683402025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] THURSDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3996/2025 Between: 1.SAGITTAL INFRA PROJECTS, DOOR NO 9-2-228/A, JANGAREDDYGUDEM WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT REP BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER SRI K. KRISHNA KISHORE ...PETITIONER AND 1.G SAI PRASAD, FATHER NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER.
THE PRI SECRETARY IRRIGATION AND WATER RESOURCES (CAD) DEPARTRNENT, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P.
2.SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR, FATHER NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER.
THE PRI SECRETARY FINANCE DEPARTMENT.
STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT SECRETARIAT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P.
3.R MOHANA RAO, FATHER NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER IRRIGATION CIRCLE, KRISHNA EASTERN DIVISION, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT.
4.B ANJANEYA PRASAD, FATHER NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, KRISHNA EASTERN DIVISION, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT.
5.KATTA SOMAIAH, FATHER NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER. PAY AND ACCOUNTS OFFICER, GOHAPUDI, -VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents herein for violating the Orders of this Honble Court passed in W.P. No. 9150 of 2024 dated 14.07.2025 in the interest of Justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.CH B R P SEKHAR Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1.NAGARAJU PULLAGURA 2.SOMA RAJU YELISETTI 3.T LAKSHMI PADMAJA The Court made the following:
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR CONTEMPT CASE No.3996 OF 2025 ORDER:-
1. It is represented by the learned counsel appearing for the respondent that, the order under Contempt is complied with.
2. The counsel appearing for the petitioner does not dispute the same.
3. In the circumstances nothing survives to be adjudicated in the contempt case and accordingly the same is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. ______________________ JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR 05.03.2026 DR
30 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR CC No.3996 of 2025 Date 05.03.2026 U DR