1 CGHC010076442025 2026:CGHC:30287 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 239 of 2025 1 - Pardesilal S/o Pukram Chandra Aged About 62 Years R/o Bartunga P.O. Dewarghata Tahsil Dabhara District - Janjgir - Chmapa (C.G.) 2 - Revatibai Wd/o Pukram Chandra Aged About 73 Years R/o Bartunga P.O. Dewarghata Tahsil Dabhara District - Janjgir - Chmapa (C.G.) --- Applicants versus 1 - Nirabai W/o Aghorilal Chandra Aged About 46 Years R/o Bartunga . Tahsil Dabhara District - Janjgir - Chmapa (C.G.) 2 - Chherkinbai W/o Laxman Prasad Chandra Aged About 65 Years R/o Bartunga Tahsil Dabhra District - Janjgir - Champa (C.G.) 3 - Revatibai W/o Guru Prasad Aged About 46 Years C/o Nawagautiyan R/o Chorthela Tahsil Dabhra District - Janjgir - Champa (C.G.) 4 - Sevatibai W/o Leeladharb Chandra Aged About 38 Years R/o Chorthela Tahsil Dabhra District - Janjgir - Chmap Chhattisgarh 5 - Sumitrabai Verma W/o Anup Kumar C/o Munna Verma Aged About 43 Years R/o Vidyut Mandal Bango Dam No. 7 Bhanchadili Tahsil Katghora District - Korba (C.G.) 6 - (Died And Deleted) Baimati Chandra As Per Honbel Court Order Dated 07 -02-2024 7 - Ratan Bai (Died Through Lrs) As Per Honbel Court Order Dated 02-04- 2024 7.1 - Mohan S/o Jadhu Ram Aged About 55 Years R/o Kate Koni Tehsil Dabhra District - Janjgir - Champa (C.G.) 7.2 - Motu Chand @ Jayprakash S/o Jadhu Ram Aged About 50 Years R/o Kate Koni Tehsil Dabhra District - Janjgir - Champa (C.G.) 2 8 - Narmada Bai W/o Jeevrakhan Prasad Aged About 50 Years R/o Bartunga Tahsil Dabhra District - Janjgir - Champa (C.G.) 9 - Murlidhar S/o Jeevrakhan Prasad Aged About 24 Years R/o Bartunga Tahsil Dabhra District - Janjgir - Champa (C.G.) 10 - Kumari Bai D/o Jeevrakhan Prasad Aged About 26 Years R/o Bartunga Tahsil Dabhra District - Janjgir - Champa (C.G.) 11 - Meena Kumari D/o Jeevrakhan Prasad Aged About 22 Years R/o Bartunga Tahsil Dabhra District - Janjgir - Champa (C.G.) 12 - Krishna Bai D/o Jeevrakhan Prasad Aged About 21 Years R/o Bartunga Tahsil Dabhra District - Janjgir - Champa (C.G.) 13 - Munni Bai D/o Jeevrakhan Prasad Aged About 17 Years Minor Through Their Mother Narmda Bai Wd/ O Jeevrakhan Prasad Chandra R/o Bartunga Tahsil Dabhra District - Janjgir - Champa (C.G.) 14 - Bhojooram S/o Jeevrakhan Prasad Aged About 15 Years Minor Through Their Mother Narmda Bai Wd/ O Jeevrakhan Prasad Chandra R/o Bartunga Tahsil Dabhra District - Janjgir - Champa (C.G.) 15 - Vimal Bai D/o Jeevrakhan Prasad Aged About 11 Years Minor Through Their Mother Narmada Bai Wd/o Jeevrakhan Prasad Chandra R/o Bartunga Tahsil Dabhra District - Janjgri -Champa (C.G.) 16 - Neetu Devi D/o Jeevrakhan Prasad Aged About 12 Years Minor Through Their Mother Narmada Bai Wd/o Jeevrakhan Prasad Chandra R/o Bartunga Tahsil Dabhra District - Janjgri -Champa (C.G.) 17 - Pukmati (Died Through Lrs) As Per Honble Court Order Dated 02-04- 2024 17.1 - Puniram S/o Saheblal Aged About 60 Years R/o Bartunga Tehsil Dabhra District - Janjgir - Chmapa (C.G.) 17.2 - Pilababu S/o Saheblal Aged About 55 Years R/o Bartunga Tehsil Dabhra District - Janjgir - Chmapa (C.G.) 18 - Teerith Bai (Died Through Lrs) As Per Honble Court Order Dated 02-04- 2024 18.1 - Budeshwar S/o Muni Chandra Aged About 40 Years R/o Chorthela Tehsil Dabhra District - Janjgir - Chmapa (C.G.) 19 - Barat Rai (Died Through Lrs) As Per Honble Court Order Dated 02-04- 2024 19.1 - Toorendra Prasad Chandra S/o Gurudev Singh Aged About 60 Years R/o Bade Katekoni Tehsil Dabhra District - Janjgir - Champa (C.G.) 20 - Janki Bai W/o Budhwa Gautiya Aged About 48 Years R/o Raikona Tahsil Blodabazar District - Raipur (C.G.) 3 21 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector District - Janjgir - Champa Chattisgarh --- Respondent(s) For applicants : Mr. Anuroop Panda, Adv. For Respondents No. 1 and 8 to 16 : Mr. Roop Naik, Adv. For respondent No. 21 : Ms. Vartika Shrivastava, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi Order On Board 16-7-2026 1. Applicants have preferred this MCC for restoration of Second Appeal No. 698/2003 which was dismissed by this Court vide order dated 14-2-2025 for want of prosecution. 2. Learned counsel for the applicants would submit that, SA No. 698/2003 was listed for hearing on 14-2-2025, but in the cause list published by the Registry for that day, names of Advocates who had left representing the appellants, were published and name of present Advocate (Mr. Anoorup Panda) of the appellants was not published, therefore, the Advocate representing them was not present when the case was taken up for hearing. Thus, non-appearance of appellant’s counsel was bonafide, hence it is prayed that the instant MCC be allowed and the SA No. 698/2003 may be restored to is original number. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents raised objection to allow the MCC. 4 4. On due consideration and for the reasons mentioned in the MCC for non-appearance of the appellants’ counsel, instant MCC is allowed. The impugned order dated 14-2-2025 is set aside. Registry is directed to restore SA No. 698/2003 (Pardesilal and anr. Vs. Nirabai and ors.) to its original number. 5. Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, stands disposed of. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge pathak AVANISH KUMAR PATHAK Digitally signed by AVANISH KUMAR PATHAK Date: 2026.07.17 12:49:33 +0530