Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27307 (PNJ)

BALWANT SINGH v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS

CWP/12829/2026 · 2026-07-09

Subhas Mehla, Vikas Bahl

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-12829-2026(O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH *** CWP-12829-2026(O&M) Date of decision : 09.07.2026 Balwant Singh ... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present: Mr. Raj Kumar Bhatia, Advocate for the petitioner (through V.C.). Mr. Pradeep Prakash Chahar, Addl.A.G. Haryana. VIKAS BAHL, J.(ORAL) 1. On 13.05.2026, a Co-ordinate Division Bench of this Court was pleased to pass the following order:- “Present: Mr. Raj Kumar Bhatia, Advocate and Mr. Zorawar Singh Mavi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Saurabh Mago, DAG Haryana for respondent Nos.1 and 2. **** Learned State counsel has pointed out that all the respondents before the Deputy Commissioner, Sirsa exercising the powers under Section 42 of the East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1948 (Annexure P-2) have not been impleaded as party in the present case. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that there is no relief claimed qua the other respondents, hence, there would be no requirement for amending the petition and only an amended memo of DAVINDER KUMAR 2026.07.09 14:17 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order / judgment CWP-12829-2026(O&M) 2 parties is required to be filed. He seeks some time to file an amended memo of parties. List on 09.07.2026. Learned counsel for the petitioner to place on record the site plan showing the earlier path which was in existence and the new path which has been carved out. 13.05.2026” 2. The said order has not been complied with. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the present petition be disposed of but liberty be granted to the petitioner to revive the same after complying with the above said order. 4. Ordered accordingly. (VIKAS BAHL) JUDGE (SUBHAS MEHLA) JUDGE July 09, 2026. Davinder Kumar Whether speaking / reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No DAVINDER KUMAR 2026.07.09 14:17 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order / judgment