Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27306 (AP)

MADUGULA SRINIVASA RAO, VISAKHAPATNAM. v. THE STATE OF AP., REP PP AND ANR.

CRLRC/761/2017 · 2026-01-26

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010684162017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 761/2017 Between: 1. MADUGULA SRINIVASA RAO, VISAKHAPATNAM, S/O LATE VENKAT RAO, AGED 35 YEARS, RESIDENT OF DOOR NO.1- 110/2, B.C. COLONY, YENDADA, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP REP PP AND ANR, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT AT HYDERABAD. 2. SMT MADUGULA TRIVENI, W/O SRINIVASA RAO, AGED/ ABOUT 28 YEARS, RESIDING AT DOOR NO.1-1-41, C/O BANDARU SURIBABU, BALAGAMETTU, BUTCHIPETA, 1ST WARD, SRIKAKULAM TOWN AND DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K JYOTHI PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) 2. P DURGA PRASAD The Court made the following: 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 761/2017 ORDER: 1. Ms. V.Sowmya, learned Counsel, representing on behalf of K.Jyothi Prasad, learned Counsel for the Revision Petitioner would submit that the Revision Petition may be dismissed as not pressed. 2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor representing State/ Respondent No.1 and learned Counsel for the 2nd Respondent are in attendance. 3. Considering the submission of the learned Counsel for the revision petitioner, the Revision Petition is dismissed as not pressed. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Criminal Revision Case shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 27.01.2026 KS 3 63 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No:761 OF 2017 Date: 27.01.2026 KS