- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32872 RP No. 183 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ REVIEW PETITION NO. 183 OF 2024 BETWEEN: SRI. K. MUNIRAJU SON OF KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, RESIDING AT 'GIRIDHAR', NO.22, 3RD CROSS, SHANIMAHATMA TEMPLE ROAD, DEVASANDRA, K.R. PURAM POST, BANGALORE-560036 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. BIPIN HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. V. KARTHIK, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. LAKSHMIDEVI WIFE OF SRI. GOPALA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.2, CHIKKA BASAVAPURA VILLAGE, VIRGONAGAR POST, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE-560049 2. SMT. H. NARAYANAMMA WIFE OF SRI. G. HANUMANTHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 82 YEARS, RESIDING AT CHIKKA BASAVAPURA, VIRGONAGAR POST, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE-560049. 3. SRI. B.N. SHIVANANDA Digitally signed by HEMALATHA J Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32872 RP No. 183 of 2024 SON OF LATE G. HANUMANTHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, RESIDING AT CHIKKA BASAVAPURA, VIRGONAGAR POST, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE-560049. 4. SRI. B.H. VIVEKANANDA SON OF LATE G. HANUMANTHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, RESIDING AT CHIKKA BASAVAPURA, VIRGONAGAR POST, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE-560049. 5. SRI. C. KRISHNA REDDY S/O LATE C. OBAL REDDY, MAJOR, RESIDING AT SUDARSHAN NILAYA, 4TH CROSS, COLLEGE ROAD, K.R. PURAM NEW EXTENSION, BANGALORE-560036 6. SRI. D.K. DEVENDRA SON OF D.K. KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.265, AHAYA NIVAS, DEVASANDRA, K.R. PURAM, BANGALORE-560036 …RESPONDENTS THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 114 AND ORDER XLVII RULE 1 OF CPC, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS OF WP NO.38519/2017 IN THIS HON'BLE COURT AND REVIEW THE ORDER DATED FEBRUARY 29, 2024, IN WP NO.38519/2017 IN THIS HON'BLE COURT AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32872 RP No. 183 of 2024 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the review writ petition. 2. The memo is taken on record. In view of the memo, the review petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 3. However, the Final Decree Court shall endeavor to dispose of final decree proceedings as early as possible within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE HJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 20