Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27301 (PNJ)

SR INNOVATION THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR PARMOD ARORA v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CWP/20201/2026 · 2026-07-08

Rohit Kapoor, To Be Nominated

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

190 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA S.R. Innovation through its Proprietor Parmod Arora State of Punjab and others CORAM: HON’BLE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Mr. Amit Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Saurabh Kapoor, Addl. AG, Haryana. ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, A.C.J. 1. Since w petition, the petitioner has not approached the appropriate first instance, l withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to avail the remedy, in accordance with law. 2. Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Liberty stands reserved to the petitioner to approach this Court again if despite such approach the authorities d law. 3. All pending misc. application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. 08.07.2026 rajesh 1. Whether speaking/reasoned? 2. Whether reportable? IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-20201 Date of Decision: 08.07.2026 Innovation through its Proprietor Parmod Arora Vs. State of Punjab and others HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR Mr. Amit Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Saurabh Kapoor, Addl. AG, Haryana. *** ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, A.C.J. (Oral) Since we find that in respect of the grievance raised , the petitioner has not approached the appropriate first instance, learned counsel for the petitioner comes up with a prayer to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to avail the remedy, in accordance with law. Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Liberty stands reserved to the petitioner to approach this Court again if despite such approach the authorities do not take necessary action in the matter, All pending misc. application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE 1. Whether speaking/reasoned? 2. Whether reportable? IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 20201-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 08.07.2026 Innovation through its Proprietor Parmod Arora …Petitioner …Respondents THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR Mr. Amit Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Saurabh Kapoor, Addl. AG, Haryana. (Oral) respect of the grievance raised in this , the petitioner has not approached the appropriate authorities at the earned counsel for the petitioner comes up with a prayer to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to avail the appropriate Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Liberty stands reserved to the petitioner to approach this Court again if despite such not take necessary action in the matter, as per All pending misc. application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA) ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE (ROHIT KAPOOR) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No in this authorities at the earned counsel for the petitioner comes up with a prayer to appropriate Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Liberty stands reserved to the petitioner to approach this Court again if despite such as per RAJESH KUMAR 2026.07.09 14:57 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.