Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27296 (CHH)

BHOTRAM ( DELETED) v. SOMARI

WP227/1299/2025 · 2026-07-14

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010525282025 2026:CGHC:30110 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 1299 of 2025 1 - Bhotram ( Deleted) Through Legal Heirs- 1.1 - Puranram, S/o Late Bhotram, Aged About 45 Years R/o Village Baraudhi, Oraonpara, Tehsil Bhatgaon, District Surajpur (C.G.) 1.2 - Premram S/o Late Bhotram, Aged About 33 Years R/o Village Baraudhi, Oraonpara, Tehsil Bhatgaon, District Surajpur (C.G.) 1.3 - Jitni Bai W/o Late Bhotram, Aged About 65 Years R/o Village Baraudhi, Oraonpara, Tehsil Bhatgaon, District Surajpur (C.G.) 1.4 - Phoolbaso D/o Late Bhotram, Aged About 38 Years R/o Village Baraudhi, Oraonpara, Tehsil Bhatgaon, District Surajpur (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Somari W/o Late Pati Cherwa, Aged About 75 Years R/o Village- Singchaura, P.S. And Tehsil Rajpur, District Balrampur Ramanujganj (C.G.) 2 - Guru, S/o Late Pati Chewra, Aged About 55 Years R/o Village- Singchaura, P.S. And Tehsil Rajpur, District Balrampur Ramanujganj (C.G.) 3 - Suru, S/o Late Pati Chewra, Aged About 52 Years R/o Village- 2 Singchaura, P.S. And Tehsil Rajpur, District Balrampur Ramanujganj (C.G.) 4 - Manpatiya Bai, W/o Shri Vijay Singh, Aged About 50 Years Occupation Farming, R/o- Rajpur, P.S. And Tehsil Rajpur, District Balrampur Ramanujganj (C.G.) 5 - Anraso, D/o Lutan, Aged About 50 Years Occupation Farming, R/o- Village- Murka, P.S. And Tehsil- Rajpur, District Balrampur Ramanujganj (C.G.) 6 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector, Balrampur, District Balrampur Ramanujganj (C.G.) 7 - Manager, Then Agriculture And Rural Development Bank Manager, District Cooperative Central Bank, Branch- Rajpur, District Balrampur Ramanujganj (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : None present. For Respondent/State : Ms. Richa Shau, PL (Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Order on Board 15/07/2026 Since none appears on behalf of the petitioner nor any representation is made even after repeated calls, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. SD/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge suguna