RANDEEP SINGH ALIAS KALA v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CRWP/5618/2026 · 2026-07-08
Sanjay Vashisth
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 27295 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 27295 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRWP-5618-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 244 CRWP-5618-2026 Decided on : 08.07.2026 RANDEEP SINGH ALIAS KALA .....PETITIONER Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ......RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH Present: Mr. Randeep S. Dhull, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Birender Bikram Attrey, AAG, Haryana. ***** SANJAY VASHISTH, J.
1. Present petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 5 of the Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 2022, seeking issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari to set aside the impugned order dated 09.04.2026 issued by respondent No.4, whereby the request of the petitioner, Randeep Singh alias Kala, aged 35 years, for release on parole for a period of three weeks. 2. Petitioner has prayed for grant of parole for 03 weeks on the ground that his minor son is suffering from neurological ailment and regular care is required of him. Proper treatment could not be given to the child because petitioner is inside jail. On hearing the counsel on 13.05.2026, the following was recorded. 3. In the status report dated 24.05.2026 filed by the State (Annexure R-1). The State has filed the report regarding the family and ailment of the child and same reads as under:-
“With reference to your office memo No. 5030 dated 22.05.2026 regarding prisoner No. CT-7014/2025, Randeep alias Kala son of Zile Singh, resident of village Manpal Patti Alewa, District Jind, Page 1 of 6 Pages PRIYANKA 2026.07.09 18:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRWP-5618-2026
who has applied for 3 weeks emergency parole, verification was conducted in the village by ASI Rajbir Singh No. 535/Jind through the concerned persons. During inquiry, it was found that the family of prisoner Randeep alias Kala consists of his (parents) and wife Suman. Prisoner Randeep and Sonu are two brothers and both are married. Sonu resides separately at Jind along with his children. It also came to notice that prisoner Randeep has one daughter, Khushi aged about 17 years, and one younger son Himanshu aged about 3 years and 5 months. It was informed that his son is suffering from a spinal bifida disease related problem in the waist/spinal area and is presently undergoing treatment at SUNFLAG GLOBAL HOSPITAL, ROHTAK. Copies of the medical documents have been produced and are enclosed herewith.
Further verification was also conducted from the concerned doctor at SUNFLAG GLOBAL HOSPITAL, ROHTAK, who informed that surgery/operation of Himanshu has been advised and time for the same has been given in the first week of June 2026. Prisoner Randeep alias Kala has filed an application before the Hon'ble High Court seeking emergency parole for treatment of his son Himanshu. Prisoner Randeep alias Kala is undergoing sentence in case FIR No. 01 dated 01.01.2008 under Sections 364 IPC and 25/54/59 Arms Act, Police Station Naraiangarh, and is presently lodged in District Jail, Jind.”
4. Apart the aforementioned added facts it has also been mentioned that petitioner is having long history of involvement in the criminal cases and thereupon details in particular regarding 17 cases have been mentioned. As per paragraph No.3 of the status report details of all 17 cases have been provided and details of such cases as under:- i. FIR No. 131 dated 31.12.2010 under Sections 307 IPC and 25/54/59 Arms Act, Police Station Alewa, registered case; convicted on 05.01.2012. ii. FIR No. 84 dated 15.02.2006 under Sections 11-59-60 PC Act and C.S. Act, Police Station City Jind; case registered and discharged. by the Hon'ble Court. iii. FIR No. 01 dated 01.01.2008 under Sections 363/364/212/120-B IPC, Police Station Narwana; acquitted by the Hon'ble Court. Page 2 of 6 Pages PRIYANKA 2026.07.09 18:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRWP-5618-2026
iv. FIR No. 594 dated 03.11.2007 under Sections 307/34 IPC and Arms Act, Police Station City Jind; pending trial before the Court. v. FIR No. 108 dated 07.07.2011 under Sections 302/148/149 IPC and Arms Act, Police Station Rajound, Kaithal; acquitted by the Hon'ble Court. vi. FIR No. 111 dated 02.08.2011 under Sections 25-54-59 Arms Act, Police Station Uchana; pending trial before the Court. vii.FIR No. 136/2011 under Section 307 IPC, Police Station Sadar Jind; convicted by the Hon'ble Court. viii.
FIR No. 221 dated 08.10.2012 under Sections 398/401 IPC and 25-54-59 Arms Act, Police Station Sadar Jind; acquitted by the Hon'ble Court. ix. FIR No. 250 dated 29.03.2013 under Section 42 Prisoners Act, Police Station City Jind; acquitted by the Hon'ble Court. x. FIR No. 228 dated 26.12.2016 under Sections 25/30/54/59 Arms Act, Police Station Alewa; convicted on 01.09.2022. xi. FIR No. 121 dated 10.07.2017 under Section 8/9 G.D. Act, Police Station Alewa; convicted on 06.02.201. xii. FIR No. 225 dated 29.08.2017 under Sections 307/34 IPC and 25-54-59 Arms Act, Police Station Sadar Narwana; acquitted by the Hon'ble Court. xiii. FIR No. 148 dated 04.09.2017 under Sections 392/506 IPC and 25-54-59 Arms Act, Police Station Alewa; acquitted by the Hon'ble Court. xiv.FIR No. 77 dated 02.06.2013 under Sections 307/148/149/302 IPC, Police Station Alewa; discharged by the Hon'ble Court on 19.12.2016. xv. FIR No. 158/2017 under Section 307 IPC and 25-54-59 Arms Act, Police Station Bhiwani; acquitted by the Hon'ble Court on 31.08.2022. xvi.FIR No. 759/2018 under Sections 323/324 IPC, Police Station Sadar Karnal; case cancelled on 04.03.2020. xvii. FIR No. 129 dated 23.05.2025 under Sections 229, 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) BNS and 323/324 IPC, Police Station Civil Lines Jind. Page 3 of 6 Pages PRIYANKA 2026.07.09 18:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRWP-5618-2026
From aforementioned details it comes out that in the cases mentioned at Sr. No. i, vii, x, xi. Petitioner was convicted, however, in the cases mentioned at Sr. No.ii, iii, v, viii, ix, xii, xiii, xiv, xv and xvi. Petitioner was either discharged or was acquitted by the respective Courts. 5. Proceedings regard to the cases mentioned at Sr. Nos. iv, vi and xvii are pending.
Therefore, prima facie considering the purpose of the Act i.e. Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 2022 for the purpose of releasing of the petitioner on parole cannot be applied so strictly as has been depicted by the State in his status report. Court has seen the medical report as well as photographs (Annexure P-2) and other relevant medical record which clearly shows that the child is suffering measurable pathetic condition and he need urgent medical care. If the prayer of petitioner is rejected, it would be it may cause damaged to the life of infant child without too providing any proper care by some responsible person. 6. However, by referring to the judgment of the Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court in the case titled ‘Kulwinder Singh @ Taina vs. State of Punjab and Others’ 2024 (3) Law Herald 872, Law Finder Doc ID #2592372, and the judgment of this Court in ‘Karanpreet Singh alias Giana alias Fateh vs. State of Punjab and Others’, passed in CRWP-344-2025, decided on 01.03.2025, learned counsel submits that in view of the purpose behind granting parole as a rehabilitative measure, the petitioner ought to be released on parole for a period of eight weeks. Accordingly, prays for quashing of the impugned order. The beneficial purpose of the discretion has already been discussed. 7. Though petitioner has prayed for release of petitioner 03 weeks, however, considering the circumstances in entirety and the ailment with which his child is suffering may require ample time for providing treatment Page 4 of 6 Pages PRIYANKA 2026.07.09 18:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRWP-5618-2026
and for the said purpose, petitioner is ordered to be released on parole for a period of 08 weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order, and subject fulfiling all the required formalities to the satisfaction of District Magistrate, Jind. Thereupon, petitioner be released on parole immediately by the Jail authorities as per law. Copy of this order be also forwarded to the concerned Jail authorities.
However, it is made clear that petitioner if found misusing the concession, immediately he will have to surrender back to the Jail thereon or the Police may also go to arrest him. It would be expected that he will not get involved in any other activity except of taking care of his child and the family members. Further, petitioner is directed to surrender back before the Jail authorities on 11.09.2026 by 5:00 P.M. Petition stands disposed of. 8. Before parting, it is apposite to notice that in the status report dated 24.05.2026 filed by the respondent-State, in Para No.3 it has been stated that the minor son, namely, Himanshu, of the petitioner, who is suffering from neurological ailment, is undergoing treatment at Sunflag Global Hospital, Rohtak. Further it has also been mentioned that surgery/operation of Himanshu was scheduled to be held in the first week of June, 2026. Even photographs of the child have been appended with the present petition as Annexure P-2, showing his ailment/condition. 9. In this view of the matter, this Court is of the considered view that the financial position of the petitioner and his other family members as regards to bear the expenses of the treatment of his minor son in a specialized hospital, is required to be ascertained so that proper treatment may be provided to the ailing child, if so required. Accordingly, learned Page 5 of 6 Pages PRIYANKA 2026.07.09 18:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRWP-5618-2026
State counsel is directed to get the financial status of the petitioner and his family members ascertained through the concerned Deputy Commissioner of the District to which the petitioner belongs. The report in that regard be placed before this Court within one week. 10. For considering this said aspect of the matter, Registry is
directed to list this case on 17.07.2026.
(SANJAY VASHISTH) JUDGE 08.07.2026 pry Whether Speaking/Reasoned: YES/NO Whether Reportable: YES/NO Page 6 of 6 Pages PRIYANKA 2026.07.09 18:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document