Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27292 (AP)

Smt. N.Shashi Sumana v. Sri Adhar Sinha, I.A.S.

CC/954/2013 · 2026-03-30

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010679222013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] TUESDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD CONTEMPT CASE NO: 954/2013 Between: 1. SMT. N.SHASHI SUMANA,, W/O. SRINIVASA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 36 YRS., OCC: HOUSE WIFE, R/O. VISHNU TOWNSHIP, KURNOOL ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI ADHAR SINHA I A S, THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, HYDERABAD. 2. SRI P V S S MURTHY, COMMISSIONER, MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF KURNOOL, KURNOOL. 3. SRI P SUDERSHAN REDDY I A S, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KURNOOL. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents for their wilful violation and deliberate disobedience to the orders passed by His Lordship Honourable Mr. Justice C.V.Ramulu as made in WPMP No. 36294 of 2008 in WP No. 27700 of 20u8, dated 19.12.2008 under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 2 1. J U M V PRASAD Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD CONTEMPT CASE NO: 954 OF 2013 The Court made the following ORAL ORDER: This Contempt Case is filed complaining of violation of the Interim Order passed by this Court dated 19.12.2008 in W.P.M.P.No.36294 of 2008 in W.P.No.27700 of 2008. 2. It transpires from the record that during the pendency of the Contempt Case, the main Writ Petition No.27700 of 2008 itself has been closed, vide Order dated 19.11.2014, which is on record. The Final Order passed by the erstwhile High Court dated 19.11.2014 is taken on record. 3. Having taken note of the same, this Court is of the view that this Contempt Case has become infructuous. 4. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs. 5. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Date: 31.03.2026 MNR 4 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD CONTEMPT CASE NO: 954 OF 2013 Dt: 31.03.2026 Mnr