IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49534 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-116 Year-2026 Thana- ARA MUFFSIL District- Bhojpur ====================================================== 1. Bharat Kumar Ram @ Bharat Ram S/o Baru Ram R/o Village - Baraka Dumra, P.S. - Ara Muffasil, Dist. - Bhojpur. 2. Baru Ram S/o Late Doman Ram R/o Village - Baraka Dumra, P.S. - Ara Muffasil, Dist. - Bhojpur. 3. Dhanjee Ram @ Golden Kumar S/o Baru Ram R/o Village - Baraka Dumra, P.S. - Ara Muffasil, Dist. - Bhojpur. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prabhat Kumar Singh, Advocate Ms. Priya, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Umeshanand Pandit, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. B. PD. SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 22-07-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioners have preferred this application for grant of anticipatory bail in connection with Ara Mufassil P. S. Case No. 116 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 351(2), 352, 74, 303(2), 117(2), 3(5) of B.N.S. 3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that on 10.04.2026, when the informant’s husband had gone to his cattle shed (Khatal), petitioners allegedly entered into the informant’s house and petitioner no. 1 attempted to outrage her modesty. Peti- tioner no. 2 assaulted her by means of lathi-danda and dragged her by pulling her hair, causing fracture in her hand. It is further al- Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49534 of 2026(2) dt.22-07-2026 2/2 leged that petitioner no. 3 snatched her earrings and chain. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are quite innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case due to village politics. There is delay of 11 days in send- ing the FIR to the court of learned ACJM. General and omnibus al- legation has been levelled against the petitioners. Moreover, the in- jury has been found to be simple in nature. 5. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioners. 6. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts and considering the clean antecedent of the petitioners, let the petitioners, above named, be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of this order, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM VI, Bhojpur at Ara in connection with Ara Mu- fassil P.S. Case No. 116 of 2026 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of BNSS. anjali/- (S. B. Pd. Singh, J) U T