Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27286 (JHR)

RAVI MAHTO v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./9085/2026 · 2026-09-28

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:29059] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.9085 of 2026 ------ 1. Ravi Mahto, aged about 30 years, Son of Nandlal Mahto. 2. Santosh Mahto, aged about 23 years, Son of Nandal Mahto, Both resident of Village- Bidra, P.O. Pandri, P.S.- Chanho, District- Ranchi. .... .... …. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Gautam Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sudhir Kumar Mahto, Addl.P.P. ------ Order No:-02 Dated:-28-09-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioners have been made accused in connection with Chanho P.S. Case No.37 of 2026 in S.T. Case No. 413 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 109, 352, 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons attempted to murder son of the informant namely Kaif Raja. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioners is false. It is further submitted that the petitioners have been in custody since 01.04.2026 as mentioned in para-01 of the instant bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-13 of the instant bail application. It is also submitted that charge-sheet has been submitted but none of the witnesses have been examined as yet. It is lastly submitted that the petitioners undertake to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertake not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioners. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Judicial Commissioner-XII, Ranchi in connection with Chanho P.S. Case No.37 of 2026 in S.T. Case No. 413 of 2026 with the condition that they will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish their mobile numbers and photocopy of the Aadhar Cards in the court below with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile numbers during the trial of the case and they will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 28.09.2026 Amar/