Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2728 (KAR)

SRI RAMANJI v. SMT. HANUMAKKA

MFA/8212/2024 · 2026-04-08

K S Hemalekha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19280 MFA No. 8212 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 8212 OF 2024 (CPC) BETWEEN: SRI RAMANJI S/O LATE DODDABASAPPA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS RESIDING AT PETHANAHALLI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI HOSAKOTE TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT …APPELLANT (BY SRI. NARASIMHARAJU.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. HANUMAKKA W/O LATE BASAPPA AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS RESIDING AT PETHANAHALLI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI HOSAKOTE TALLUK - 562 114 BENGAURU RURAL DISTRICT 2. SMT. RADHAMMA D/O LATE BASAPPA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS RESIDING AT PETHANAHALLI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI HOSAKOTE TLAUK - 562 114 BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT 3. SRI RAVI KUMAR S/O LATE BASAPPA Digitally signed by MAHALAKSHMI B M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19280 MFA No. 8212 of 2024 AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS RESIDING AT PETHANAHALLI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI HOSAKOTE TALLUK - 562 114 BENGAURU RURAL DISTRICT 4. SMT. GEETHA D/O LATE BASAPPA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS RESIDING AT PETHANAHALLI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI HOSAKOTE TALLUK - 562 114 BENGAURU RURAL DISTRICT 5. SRI B BALARAJU S/O LATE BASAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS RESIDING AT PETHANAHALLI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI HOSAKOTE TALLUK - 562 114 BENGAURU RURAL DISTRICT 6. SMT. LAKSHMAMMA D/O LATE BASAPPA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS RESIDING AT PETHANAHALLI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI HOSAKOTE TALLUK - 562 114 BENGAURU RURAL DISTRICT 7. SMT. MANJULA @ MANJU BHARGAVI D/O LATE BASAPPA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS RESIDING AT PETHANAHALLI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI HOSAKOTE TALLUK - 562 114 BENGAURU RURAL DISTRICT 8. SRI V CHANDRASHEKAR REDDY S/O V VENKATA SUBBA REDDY AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19280 MFA No. 8212 of 2024 RESIDING AT NO.100 5TH BLOCK,60 FEET ROAD KORAMANGALA BENGALURU - 560 095 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. H R MANJUNATHA.,ADVOCATE; V/O DTD: 31/1/25, NOTICE TO R1 TO R7 D/W) THIS MFA IS FILED U/O.43 RULE 1(r) OF THE CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DT.29.08.2024 PASSED ON IA NO.1 TO 3 IN O.S.NO.163/2024 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HOSAKOTE, REJECTING IA NO.1 AND 2 FILED U/O.39 RULE 1 AND 2 R/W SEC.151 OF CPC, ALLOWING IA NO.3 FILED U/O.39 RULE 4 R/W SEC.151 OF CPC. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel appearing for the appellant has filed a memo seeking to withdraw this Miscellaneous First Appeal, which reads as under: " The undersigned counsel for Appellant herein submits that, as per the instruction of the appellant, the subject matter involved in the present appeal is settled out of the court, since the Appellant has executed Confirmation Deed dated in favour of the Respondent No.8. Therefore, under the said circumstances the aforesaid appeal will not survive - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19280 MFA No. 8212 of 2024 for the consideration. Hence the appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn, same may be taken on record at the ends of justice." 2. The said memo is taken on record. 3. In view of the memo, the Miscellaneous First Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- _____________________ JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA PHM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 38