1 APHC010285492026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 14889/2026 Between: 1. G. ADINARAYANA, S/O. LATE G. VENKATARAMANAPPA, AGE 82 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O. NAGASAMUDRAM VILLAGE , CHENNEKOTHAPALLI MANDAL, SRI SATHYA SAI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT (ASSIGNMENT), SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.522238 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ANANTHAPURAMU, ANANTHAPURAMU PISTRICT.515134 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, DHARMAVARAM, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT.515134 4. THE TAHSILDAR, CHENNEKOTHAPALLI MANDAI, SRI SATHYA SAI DISTRICT515134 5. THE MANDAL SURVEYOR, CHENNEKOTHAPALLI MANDAL, SRI SATHYA SAI DISTRICT.515134 6. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, NAGASAMUDRAM VIILAGE , CHENNEKOTHAPALLI MANDAL, SRI SATHYA SAI DISTRICT.515134 7. THE VILLAGE REVENUE OFFICER VRO, NAGASAMUDRAM 2 VIILAGE , CHENNEKOTHAPALLI MANDAL, SRI SATHYA SAI DISTRICT.515134 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction declaring high handed actions of Respondents No. 3 to 7 in attempting to dispossess the petitioner from the subject land in Survey No. 170/2 to an Extent of 0.07 Cents of Hey storage place and to an Extent of 0.04 cents of Cattle shed situation at Nagasamudram Village , Chennekothapalli Mandal Sri Sathya Sai District.without following due process of law and without following any procedure contemplated under law is illegal, arbitrary and violation of article 300-A Constitution of India and consequently to direct the Respondent Nos.3 to 7 not interfere, and also not to disturb/dispossess the petitioner from the land in question i.e.. Survey No. 170/2 to an Extent of 0.07 Cents of Hey storage place and to an Extent of 0.04 cents of Cattle shed situation at Nagasamudram Village , Chennekothapalli Mandal Sri Sathya Sai District, and to pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the Respondent 3 to 7 not 1o interfere/ dispossess the petitioner from the land in question i.e., Survey No. 170/2 to an Extent of 0.07 Cents of Hey storage place and to an Extent of 0.04 cents of Cattle shed situation at Nagasamudram Village , Chennekothapalli Mandal Sri Sathya Sai District pending disposal of the writ petition and to pass such other Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N ASWARTHA NARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR ASSIGNMENT 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader. 2. Mr.N.Aswartha Narayana, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents 3 to 7 have been attempting to dispossess the petitioner from the subject land without following the due process of law. 3. Mr.T.Sanjeev Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader, on written instructions, submits that there is no record of evidence in respect of the subject land in favour of the petitioner. The petitioner also has not submitted any representation to the respondent No.4 for sanction of possession certificate, so far. It is further submitted that if any eligible person applies for house site patta or possession certificate through online, after verification of the eligibility, appropriate certificate would be issued. The petitioner has not applied for any house site patta through online also. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been in possession and enjoyment of the subject property since long time and he requests for grant of patta. 5. Having regard to the entire facts and circumstances of the case, the respondents are not supposed to make any attempt to dispossess the petitioner from the subject land without following the due process of law. 4 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner from the subject land without following the due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. ________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dt: 28.05.2026 ARR/KNN 5 8 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 14889/2026 Date : 28.05.2026 ARR/KNN