Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27273 (AP)

P IMMANIEL v. THE STATE OF AP

WP(PIL)/3/2026 · 2026-01-06

Challa Gunaranjan, Dhiraj Singh Thakur

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010683022025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI W.P(PIL).No.3 of 2026 Bench Sr.No:-5 [3552] P. Immaniel ...Petitioner Vs. The State of Andhra Pradesh and others ...Respondents ********** Advocate for petitioner : Sri Pala Karthi Kiran Advocate for respondents : Learned Government Pleader for Services CORAM : THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN DATE : 7th January 2026 P C : The petitioner challenges the appointment of respondent No.4 as a Junior Assistant on compassionate grounds by claiming that the certificates on the basis of which the appointment was sought and obtained were forged and fabricated. 2. In our opinion, the Public Interest Litigation is not maintainable. Reference in this regard can be made to the judgments of the Apex Court in Dr. Duryodhan Sahu v. Jitendra Kumar Mishra1 and Gurpal Singh v. State of Punjab2. It would be, however, open to the petitioner to approach the learned single Judge by way of Quo Warranto, if so advised. 1 [(1998) 7 SCC 273] 2 [(2005) 5 SCC 136] 2 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition (PIL) is disposed of. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CJ CHALLA GUNARANJAN, J AMD 3 04 HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CHIEF JUSTICE & HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN W.P(PIL).No.3 of 2026 Dt:07.01.2026 AMD