Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27271 (PNJ)

SHREE RAMJI DASS STEEL ROLLING MILLS v. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

CWP/9411/2026 · 2026-07-08

Rohit Kapoor, To Be Nominated

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

117 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CM-8095-CWP-2026 in/and CWP-9411-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision:08.07.2026 SHREE RAMJI DASS STEEL ROLLING MILLS ....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS ….RESPONDENT(S) CORAM:- HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR Present: Mr. Mukul Singla, Advocate for the applicant-petitioner. Mr. Saurabh Kapoor, Addl., AG, Punjab. ***** ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, A.C.J. (Oral) CM-8095-CWP-2026 (preponement) 1. This application under Section 151 CPC has been filed on behalf of the applicant-petitioner seeking preponement of the date of hearing fixed in the main writ petition. 2. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed. The date already fixed in the main writ petition is preponed to today. Main Case (O&M) 3. With the consent of all the parties, main writ petition is taken on board for hearing. 4. The present writ petition has been filed seeking quashing of Notification No.9/2023-Central Tax dated 31.03.2023 (Annexure P-7), Notification No.71/P.A.5/2017/S. 168A/2023 dated 23.08.2023 (Annexure P-8) as also for quashing of order dated 24.08.2023 (Annexure P-12), as the same have been passed without affording an opportunity of personal hearing. Relief has, however, been confined to the final orders RAHUL JOSHI 2026.07.09 14:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court, CHD CWP-9411-2026 (O&M) 2 on the ground that they are passed without affording any opportunity of personal hearing, therefore, the impugned action of the respondent(s) amounts to a violation of principles of natural justice. 5. Learned State counsel, who has appeared on advance notice does not dispute the factual aspects that opportunity of personal hearing was not afforded to the petitioner. Learned State counsel, therefore, states that the matter can be conveniently remitted back to the concerned authority, for conducting the proceedings afresh in accordance with law after affording an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner. 6. In view of the fair stand taken by the respondents, this matter is remitted back to the authority concerned, and the impugned order dated 15.06.2023 (Annexure P-10) is set aside. The respondents shall proceed afresh in accordance with law after affording an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner. It is further provided that no coercive action henceforth shall be taken in the matter and any recovery already made shall abide by the fresh orders to be passed in accordance with law. 7. Petition stands disposed of accordingly. 8. All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. [ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA] ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE [ROHIT KAPOOR] JUDGE JULY 08, 2026 Rahul Joshi 1. Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No 2. Whether Reportable Yes/No RAHUL JOSHI 2026.07.09 14:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court, CHD