- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33240 WP No. 19696 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.19696 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. N. CHELAVARAJU S/O LATE M.N. NARASIMHAIAH AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS R/A MANDAGERE AT AND POST K.R. PET TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 423. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. BASAVARAJU M.C., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE SECRETARY GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDI M.S. BUILDING BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER MANDYA DISTRICT MANDYA- 571 401. 3. THE TASHILDHAR K.R. PET TALUK Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33240 WP No. 19696 of 2026 K.R. PET - 571 426 MANDYA DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SPOORTHY HEGDE N., HCGP) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE 3RD RESPONDENT TO RECTIFY THE MISTAKE IN ALL THE COMPUTER GENERATED REVENUE RECORDS IN RESPECT OF THE LAND GRANTED IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER BEARING SY.NO.45, MEASURING 4 ACRES (10 GUNTAS KHARAB), SITUATED AT MANDAGERE VILLAGE, AKKIHEBBALU HOBLI, K.R. PET TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT BY INCORPORATING THE NAME OF THE PETITIONER AS OWNER OF THE SAID LAND IN PLACE OF GOVERNMENT AND ISSUE NECESSARY COMPUTER GENERATED REVENUE RECORDS IN THE NAME OF THE PETITIONER BY CONSIDERING THE REPRESENTATIONS DATED 31/03/2023 AND 21/05/2025 VIDE ANNEXURE H AND J TO THE WRIT PETITION MADE BY THE PETITIONER UNDER THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33240 WP No. 19696 of 2026 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER 1. In this Writ Petition, petitioner has sought for rectification of the entry in the RTC records in respect of the subject land and accordingly, petitioner has approached respondent Nos.2 and 3 as per Annexure-H dated 31.03.2023 and Annexure-J dated 21.05.2022. 2. Having taken note of the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the parties, it is reflected in the revenue records as stated by the petitioner himself that the entry is "sarkari" in the revenue records. Therefore, it is open for the petitioner to challenge the said entry under Section 136(2) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964, before the competent authority. Reserving such liberty to the petitioner, the Writ Petition is disposed of. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 26