[2026:RJ-JP:9145] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 23282/2018 Rajkumari D/o Amar Singh, Aged About 34 Years, B/c Jatav, R/o Village Nahara Chouth, Tehsil Deeg, District Bharatpur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Medical Health And Family Welfare, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Project Director, Nhm Medical Health Department, Directorate, Medical Health And Family Welfare, (Raj.) Jaipur. 3. Additional Director (Administration), Medical Health And Family Welfare, Directorate, Medical Health And Family Welfare (Raj.) Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nikhilesh Katara For Respondent(s) : Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 27/02/2026 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioner with following prayer: “It is therefore humbly prayed that your Lordship may please to call for entire records of the case and be further allow the writ petition and thereby please to issue directions in nature thereof, thereby direct the respondents to grant the benefit of regularization and accord the seniority and other service benefits to the petitioner from the date of appointment as given to other persons selected in their earlier merit list through same process.” [2026:RJ-JP:9145] (2 of 2) [CW-23282/2018] 2. Learned counsel for petitioner while referring and relying upon judgment dated 24.05.2017 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.8016/2017 titled as Leela Ram Parmar and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Hon’ble Court. He further submitted that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid order. 3. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for parties and also material placed on record, the writ petition may be disposed in light of Leela Ram Parmar and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra). 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of in terms of ratio laid down in case of Leela Ram Parmar and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra). The respondents are at liberty to verify veracity of the facts before extending the same benefits to the petitioner. 5. Needless to say that if ratio is applicable upon facts of the case as claimed by the petitioner, then same benefits be extended to the petitioner. 6. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /229