- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34421 WP No. 20423 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 20423 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. GOVINDARAJU R. S/O LATE RANGASHAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/AT NO. 500, GIRISINDURA, 2ND CROSS, HESARAGHATTA MAIN ROAD, NAGASANDRA, BENGALURU NORTH, BENGALURU - 560073. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SANDESHA A. S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M. S. BUILDING, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE THASILDAR, TALUK OFFICE GUBBI, GUBBI TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT, PIN-572216. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B.P. RADHA, AGA) Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34421 WP No. 20423 of 2026 THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION IN THE NATURE OF A WRIT, DIRECTING THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 02.06.2026, PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-F AND CONSEQUENTLY EFFECT THE NECESSARY CORRECTIONS IN THE RTC ENTRIES IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for the respondents. 2. In this writ petition, the petitioner has sought for direction to respondent No.2 to consider the representation dated 02.06.2026 (Annexure-F) to effect necessary correction in the RTC entries. 3. On careful consideration of the representation at Annexure-F would indicate that the petitioner seeking to enter their name based on the registered sale deed dated 18.05.1953. In that view of the matter, it is not - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34421 WP No. 20423 of 2026 forthcoming as to why the revenue records have not been mutated and have been changed in the name of the grandfather of the petitioner since 1953. 4. In that view of the matter, the petitioner is to establish right over the property in question and thereafter seek appropriate relief before the competent authority. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE MCR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 38