Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27265 (KAR)

MRS. NEETHA v. SRI. MUTHUVELU PANDAIN

RP/317/2025 · 2026-07-08

E S Indiresh

Review Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34867 RP No. 317 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH REVIEW PETITION NO. 317 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. MRS. NEETHA W/O. A. MOHAN BABU, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, OCC : BUSINESS, ADDRESS NO. A-403, LAKE SILVER SPRING LAYOUT, MUNIKOLALA, BENGALURU -560 037. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. DALWAI VENKATESH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. MUTHUVELU PANDAIN S/O LATE RAMASWAMY AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, NO.807, BEHIND POST OFFICE KADUGODI, BENGALURU -67 2. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU - 560 001. Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34867 RP No. 317 of 2025 3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT BENGALURU - 560 009. 4. THE ASST. COMMISSIONER BENGALURU NORTH SUB-DIVISION KANDAYA BHAVANA K.G.ROAD BENGALURU - 560 009. 5. THE TAHSILDAR BENGALURU SOUTH ADDL. TALUK BENGALURU - 560 009. 6. THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR BENGALURU EAST TALUK KRISHNARAJAPURA BENGALURU - 560 036. 7. PREM RAMACHANDRA S/O RAMACHANDRA MAJOR IN AGE NO. 64, ROYAL PARK TERRACE HILLS DAILE N.T. USA. 8. SMT. SUNITHA BHATIA W/O LATE B.RAMESH KUMAR MAJOR IN AGE, NO. 1882, 9TH CROSS, 5TH MAIN RPC LAYOUT, VIJAYA NAGAR II STAGE BENGALURU - 560 040. 9. B.MANOHARLAL S/O LATE H. BHAVARLAL - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34867 RP No. 317 of 2025 MAJOR IN AGE, NO. 238, THIMMAIAH ROAD BENGALURU - 560 001. 10. B. ASHOK KUMAR S/O LATE H.BHAVARLAL MAJOR IN AGE, NO. 238, THIMMAIAH ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001. 11. B. RAJESH KUMAR S/O LATE H.BHAVARLAL MAJOR IN AGE NO.238, THIMMAIAH ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001. 12. SMT. SUSHEELA D/O LATE H.BHAVARLAL MAJOR IN AGE, NO.238, THIMMAIAH ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001. 13. SMT. SAVITHA D/O LATE H.BHAVARLAL MAJOR IN AGE, NO. 238, THIMMAIAH ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. M. JAGANNATH ALVA, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. SPOORTHY HEGDE N., HCGP FOR R2 TO R6; SRI. N. SRIDHAR, ADVOCATE FOR R9 TO R11) - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34867 RP No. 317 of 2025 THIS RP IS FILED UNDER ORDER XLVII RULE 1 OF CPC R/W SECTION 114 OF CPC, PRAYING TO REVIEW THE ORDER DATED 29.04.2025 PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE HIGH COURT IN WP NO.23317/2024 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE H AND GRANT APPROPRIATE RELIEFS IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. This review Petition is filed to review the order dated 29.04.2025 in W.P.No.23317 of 2024 (Annexure-H). 3. Having Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and on careful consideration of the papers would indicate that the petitioner has not made out a case for review of the order as required under Order 47 Rule 1 of CPC along with Section 114 of CPC. - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34867 RP No. 317 of 2025 In that view of the matter, this court cannot review the order passed in W.P.No.23317 of 2015, as there is not error apparent on the face of record, however, it is open for the petitioner to challenge the same by way of appeal. 4. If such an appeal is filed within an outer limit of four weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order, the appellate Court shall consider the petitioner's request for condonation of the period spent in prosecuting the present Review Petition, as per Section 14 of the Limitation Act, while considering an application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963. Accordingly, the Review Petition stands dismissed. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE SB; List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2