APHC010675682025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THURSDAY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY THE HONOURABLE SRI WRIT PETITION NO: 34822/2025 Between: 1. SRI VENKATESWARA COTTON TRADERS, REP BY ITS PROPRIETOR MANCHIKALAPUDI PADMAJA W/O RAMARAO AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS R/O. 11 MILL, BESIDES CINE SQUARE THEATRE, A GUNTUR-522002 1. M/S UCO BANK, Rep by its General Manager, Guntur mid Corporate Branch (0223), 9/1, Arundalpeta, Guntur A.P.52002, Ph.No.9230500223, Emailguntur@ucobank.co.in Petition under Article circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS to declare the action of issuing an E-Auction Sale Notice dated 06 mandatory 30-days pre Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002. The said action of the respondent is wholly illegal, arbitrary, violative of the mandatory procedure prescribed under the SARFAESI Act, and contrary to the principles of natural justice. Therefore, the petitioner prays that this Honble Court be pleased to suspend the impugned E IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA WRIT PETITION NO: 34822/2025 SRI VENKATESWARA COTTON TRADERS, REP BY ITS PROPRIETOR MANCHIKALAPUDI PADMAJA W/O RAMARAO AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS R/O. 11-683, OMKARNATH COTTON GINNING MILL, BESIDES CINE SQUARE THEATRE, AMARAVATHI ROAD, ...PETITIONER AND M/S UCO BANK, Rep by its General Manager, Guntur mid Corporate Branch (0223), 9/1, Arundalpeta, Guntur A.P.52002, Ph.No.9230500223, Emailguntur@ucobank.co.in ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS to declare the action of the respondent Bank in Auction Sale Notice dated 06-12-2025, without issuing the days pre-sale notice as required under Rule 8(6) of the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002. The said action of the illegal, arbitrary, violative of the mandatory procedure prescribed under the SARFAESI Act, and contrary to the principles of natural justice. Therefore, the petitioner prays that this Honble Court be pleased to suspend the impugned E-Auction Sale Notice dated 06-12-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3558] THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA SRI VENKATESWARA COTTON TRADERS, REP BY ITS PROPRIETOR MANCHIKALAPUDI PADMAJA W/O RAMARAO AGED 683, OMKARNATH COTTON GINNING MARAVATHI ROAD, ...PETITIONER M/S UCO BANK, Rep by its General Manager, Guntur mid Corporate Branch (0223), 9/1, Arundalpeta, Guntur A.P.52002, ...RESPONDENT 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of the respondent Bank in 2025, without issuing the sale notice as required under Rule 8(6) of the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002. The said action of the illegal, arbitrary, violative of the mandatory procedure prescribed under the SARFAESI Act, and contrary to the principles of natural justice. Therefore, the petitioner prays that this Honble Court be pleased to 2025 and pass 2 CMR,J & GTK,J W.P.No.34822 of 2025 IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the impugned E-Auction Sale Notice dated 06-12-2025 pending disposal of the main Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PONNEKANTI MALLIKARJUNA RAO Counsel for the Respondent: 1. RAMA KRISHNA A 3 CMR,J & GTK,J W.P.No.34822 of 2025 The Court made the following: ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Cheekati Manavendranath Roy) When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________________________ JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY _____________________________ JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA Date: 08.01.2026 MDP