Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27244 (AP)

M/s Sagittal Infra Projects v. SRI G SAI PRASAD

CC/3940/2025 · 2026-01-27

Sumathi Jagadam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010674962025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3940/2025 Between: 1. M/S SAGITTAL INFRA PROJECTS, DOOR NO 9-2-228/A, JANGAREDDYGUDEM WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT REP BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER SRI K. KRISHNA KISHORE ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI G SAI PRASAD, FATHER NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER. THE PRI SECRETARY IRRIGATION AND WATER RESOURCES (CAD) DEPARTMENT, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. 2. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR, FATHER NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER. THE PRI SECRETARY FINANCE DEPARTMENT, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. 3. R MOHANA RAO, FATHER NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER IRRIGATION CIRCLE, KRISHNA EASTERN DIVISION VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT. 4. B ANJANEYA PRASAD, FATHER NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, KRISHNA EASTERN DIVISION, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT. 2 5. KATTA SOMAIAH, FATHER NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER. PAY AND ACCOUNTS OFFICER, GOLLAPUDI VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to punish the respondents herein for violating the Orders of this Honble Court passed in W.P. No 9318 of 2024 dated 06- 05-2025 in the interest of Justice and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. CH B R P SEKHAR Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. T S RAYALU 3 The Court made the following ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.9318 of 2024 has been complied with by the respondents. Hence, no further orders are required in this contempt case. Recording the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, the Contempt Case stands closed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 28.01.2026 KAS 4 170 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3940/2025 Dated: 28.01.2026 KAS