APHC010682122025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 35135/2025 Between: KANCHANAPALLI NAGARAJU, S/O.SEETHA RAMAIAH, AGED 50 YEARS, SUPERVISOR IN PETROL BUNK, PREVIOUSLY HE IS RESIDING AT DR.NO.7-145, 2ND LANE, GANDHIPET, NEAR INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK,CHILAKALURIPET, PALNADU DISTRICT PRESENTLY R/O.DR.NO.7- 76, GABBIVARI STREET, REVENUE WARD NO.4, C/O.KOTHAPALLI MANJULA, CHILAKALURIPET TOWN. PALNADU DISTRICT 522616 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 522237 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PALNADU DISTRICT 522601 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NARASARAOPET, PALNADU DISTRICT 502601 4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHILAKALURIPET RURAL POLICE STATION, PALNADU DISTRICT 522601 5. JOOLAGANTY JULAKANTI VENKATA DILIP, S/O.LATE VEERA SWAMY, AGED 42 YEARS, R/O.2ND LANE, PANDARIPURAM, CHILAKALURIPET, C/O.M.JAGANNADHAM AND J.S.PRASAD OF HP PETROL BUNK 0PP.MRO OFFICE, KASTURIBAI ROAD, CHILAKALURIPET, PALNADU DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. HABIBULLA SHAIK Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents particularly the respondent No.4 in harassing, threatening and coercing the 2 petitioner calling him to police station forcing to compromise the matter with respondent No.5, thereby interfering in a civil dispute to withdraw, which is pending before the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Narasaraopet in I.P.No.23 of 2025 as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and violates my fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequentially direct the respondent No.4 not to interfere with the civil disputes between the petitioner and respondent No.5 in I.P.No.23 of 2025 on the file of the Hon’ble Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Narasaraopet, by calling him to the police station.” 2. Sri P.Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that, on the complaint given by one Joolaganty @ Julakanti Venkata Dilip through PGRS before the Superintendent of Police, Palnadu District, which was endorsed to the SHO, Chilakaluripet Rural Police Station, the Petitioner was called for preliminary enquiry. It is further submitted that, the Police, on enquiry, having found that it is a financial dispute, not registered any crime against the Petitioner and not interfered in the civil disputes between the parties. 3. Sri Habibulla Shaik, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that, recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, Police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:02.01.2026 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.35135 of 2025 Dt.02.01.2026 Dinesh