APHC010679962018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 32669/2018 Between: 1. V.KHALANDAR,, S/O HUSSAIN, AGED 32 YEARS, OCC. INCLUSIVE EDUCATION RESOURCE TEACHER (IERT), BHAVITHA CENTRE/ MANDAL RESOURCE CENTRE(MRC) GALIVEDU VILLAGE AND MANDAL Y.S.R.KADAPA DISTRICT. 2. T.RAMABABU, S/O OBAIAH, AGED 45 YEARS, OCC. INCLUSIVE EDUCATION RESOURCE TEACHER (IERT), BHAVITHA CENTRE/ MANDAL RESOURCE CENTRE(MRC) SIMHADRIPURAM MANDAL, Y.S.R.KADAPA DISTRICT. 3. K.PRASHANTHI, D/O K.V.PRASAD, AGED 31 YEARS, OCC. INCLUSIVE EDUCATION RESOURCE TEACHER (IERT), BHAVITHA CENTRE MANDAL RESOURCE CENTRE(MRC) MRC RAJUPALEM MANDAL, Y.S.R.KADAPA DISTRICT. 4. G.ADILAKSHMI, D/O RAMAIAH, AGED 38 YEARS, OCC. INCLUSIVE EDUCATION RESOURCE TEACHER (IERT), BHAVITHA CENTRE MANDAL RESOURCE CENTRE(MRC) B.KODURU MANDAL, Y.S.R.KADAPA DISTRICT. 5. M.VASUDHA, D/O VIJAYA KUMAR AGED 34 YEARS, OCC. INCLUSIVE EDUCATION RESOURCE TEACHER (IERT), BHAVITHA CENTRE MANDAL RESOURCE CENTRE(MRC), C K DINNE MANDAL, Y.S.R.KADAPA DISTRICT. 6. D.RAMESH, S/O MARENNA, AGED 36 YEARS, OCC.INCLUSIVE EDUCATION RESOURCE TEACHER (IERT), BHAVITHA CENTRE/ MANDAL RESOURCE CENTRE(MRC) THONDURU MANDAL 2 Y.S.R.KADAPA DISTRICT. 7. CH.CHOWDAMMA, D/O CHOWDAIAH AGED 27 YEARS, OCC. INCLUSIVE EDUCATION RESOURCE TEACHER (IERT), BHAVITHA CENTRE/ MANDAL RESOURCE CENTRE(MRC) CHENNUR MANDAL, Y.S.R.KADAPA DISTRICT. 8. CH.NARASIMHA REDDY, S/O NARAYANA REDDY AGED 35 YEARS, OCC. INCLUSIVE EDUCATION RESOURCE TEACHER (IERT), BHAVITHA CENTRE/ MANDAL RESOURCE CENTRE(MRC) PEDDAMANDEM MANDAL, Y.S.R.KADAPA DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE PROJECT DIRECTOR, SARVA SHIKSHA ABHIYAN (SSA), KBC ZILLA PARISHAD HIGH SCHOOL (BOYS) HIGH SCHOOL ROAD, PATAMATA, VIJAYAWADA. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT PROJECT DIRECTOR, SARVA SHIKSHA ABHIYAN(SSA), M-SEVA COMPLEX, NGO COLONY KADAPA Y.S.R.KADAPA DISTRICT. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR/CHAIRMAN, SARVA SHIKSHA ABHIYAN (SSA), Y.S.R.DISTRICT AT KADAPA. 4. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Madamus declaring the action of the respondents in issued the impugned Proc. Rc.No.1581/APSSA/IE/A11/2017, dated 14-05-2018 for termination of the petitioners from service from the posts of Inclusive Education Resource Teacher (IERT) on contract basis, as highly illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and contrary to the guidelines and consequentially, this Honourable court may pleased to set aside the impugned 3 proceedings dated 14-05-2018 by declaring that the petitioners are entitled for continue in service as IERTs on contract basis and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents continue the petitioners in service as Inclusive Education Resource Teacher (IERT) on contract basis, by suspending the impugned Proceedings Rc.No.1581/APSSA/IE/A11/2017, date14-05-2018 issued by the respondents pending disposal of tl above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. M R TAGORE Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. REVANURU SUDHA RANI (SC FOR SAMAGRA SHIKSHA) 2. GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION (AP) 3. VAKA KRANTHI SRI The Court made the following: 4 Order:- This writ petition was filed declaring the action of the respondents in issuing the impugned Proc. Rc.No.1581/APSSA/IE/A11/2017, dated 14.05.2018, terminating the petitioners from service from the posts of Inclusive Education Resource Teacher (IERT) on contract basis, as illegal and arbitrary. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the grievance of the petitioners has been adequately addressed by the respondents. 3. Recording the same, this writ petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 05.03.2026 PNS