Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2724 (AP)

K. YOGESWARA RAO v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/14682/2026 · 2026-05-28

Balaji Medamalli

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010282742026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3573] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI WRIT PETITION NO: 14682/2026 Between: 1. K. YOGESWARA RAO, S/O RAM MOHANA RAO AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, OCCU CULTIVATION, R/O H NO 1-54, MARRIBANDAM VILLAGE, NUZVID MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.-522237 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, ANDHRA PRADESH, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.-522503 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ELURU DISTRIPT AT ELURU.- 534002 4. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NUZVID, ELURU DISTRICT.-521201 5. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NUZVID RURAL POLICE STATION, NUZVID, ELURU DISTRICT.-521201 6. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, NUZVID RURAL POLICE STATION, NUZVID, ELURU DISTRICT.-521201 7. K RAMA KRISHNA, S/O FATHER NAME NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC INSPECTOR OF POLICE WORKING AS INSPECTOR OF POLICE NUZVID RURAL PS NUZVID, ELURU DISTRICT- 521201 8. SMT DAVULURI PRABHAVATI, W/O VIJAYA KRISHNA, AGED 34 YEARS OCC EX- EMPLOYEE R/O SEETHARAMPURAM VILLAGE NUZIVD MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT -521105. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toPleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the official respondents more particularly the action of the respondent No 5 in insisting the petitioner to come to 6th respondent Police Station with photographs and personal data including Adahaar card on the pretext of opening of Rowdy/Suspect sheet against him and keeping surveillance against him and thus interfering with his personal liberty as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 19 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the official respondents not to interfere with his personal liberty and not to insist him to come to 6th respondent Police Station with photographs and personal data for the purpose of opening Rowdy/Suspect Sheet against him or any other purpose without following due process of law and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to direct the official respondents not to call the petitioner to the 6th respondent Police Station and not to insist him to furnish personal data and photographs for the purpose of opening Rowdy/Suspect Sheet against him or for any other purpose without following due process of law pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P SREE RAMULU NAIDU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following Order: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present Writ Petition has become infructuous and no further cause survives to adjudicate in the matter. He, therefore, seeks to withdraw the present Writ Petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, the present Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ______________________ BALAJI MEDAMALLI, J 29.05.2026 MJA 8 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI WRIT PETITION NO: 14682/2026 29.05.2026 MJA