Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27230 (AP)

Tummuri Jalandhari v. Dr. Y V.Sharma

CC/1691/2013 · 2026-03-30

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010681092013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] TUESDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1691/2013 Between: 1. TUMMURI JALANDHARI,, D/O SURI BABU, AGED ABOUT 17 YEARS, BEING MINOR REPRESENTATED BY HER NATURAL GURADAIN FATHER TUMMURI SURI BABU, S/O SUBBARAYUDU, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, HINDU, R/O D.NO. 8-105/2. MUMMIDIVARAM VILLAGE & MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. DR Y V SHARMA, S/o Y.V. Krishna Murthy aged about 65 years, Principal, GSL, Medical College, Rajahmundry, R/o Rajanagaram, East Godavari District. ...CONTEMNOR Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to summon the respondents/Contemnors and punish him for violating the Order dated 26-07-2013 passed by this Hon'ble Court W.P.M.P. No. 26451 of 2013 in W.P. No. 21594 of 2013 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2013(APPL 877 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to direct the respondent to implement the order W.P.M.P.No.26451 of 2 2013 in W.P.No.21954 of 2013 dated 26-07-2013 by receiving the application of the petitioner into MBBS "C" (1) Category for 2013-2014 and pass IA NO: 3 OF 2013(APPL 6166 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G SIMHADRI Counsel for the Contemnor: 1. The Court made the following: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1691/2013 ORDER: This contempt case is filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of the orders passed by this Court. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no further orders are required to be passed in the contempt case and the matter becomes infructuous. Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 31.03.2026 TTPPSS 4 72 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1691/2013 31.03.2026 TTPPSS