Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27226 (AP)

Chintham Sreedevi v. The State of A.P.

WP/30575/2013 · 2026-03-31

Harinath N

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010677592013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 30575/2013 Between: 1. CHINTHAM SREEDEVI, W/O.REDDY SEKHAR REDDY, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.1-83, BALIREDDYGARIPALLI, GORLAMUDIVEEDU VILLAGE, RAYACHOTY MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF A P, REPRESENTED BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KADAPA. 2. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, DISTRICT WOMEN AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT ORGANISATION, KADAPA. 3. THE INTEGRATED CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER, THE INTEGRATED CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT, RAYACHOTY, KADAPA DISTRICT. 4. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KADAPA. 5. J RADHA, W/O. MAHESWARA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/O.GORLAMUDIVEEDU VILLAGE, RAYACHOTY MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction particularly Writ of Mandamus 2 directing the respondents 1 to 4 to issue appointment orders to the petitioner for the post of Anganvadi Volunteer to be posted at Gorlamudiveedu Village, by duly declaring the selection and appointment of the 5th respondent as illegal and arbitrary in the interest of justice IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 37966 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to expedite the hearing of the Writ Petition by fixing an early date in the interest of justice Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G RAMACHANDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR WOMEN DEV, CHILD WELFARE The Court made the following: 3 Order:- Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive any further. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 01.04.2026 SR