08.07.2026 Court No.35. D/L. 302. Kausik (Rejected) CRM (NDPS) 1387 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with Baishnabnagar Police Station Case No. 1260 of 2025 dated 28.09.2025 under Sections 21(c)/27(A)/29 of the NDPS Act, 1985. And In the matter of : Samim Aktar ……Petitioner. Mr. Md. Wasim Akram ……for the Petitioner. Mr. Sagar Saha Ms. Nayana Mukhopadhyay ……for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been implicated on the basis of alleged recovery of 1117 Gms. of Brown Sugar. Charge sheet has already been submitted and petitioner is in custody for more than 9 and half months. Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail. I have taken into account the quantum of seizure and is of the opinion that the rigors of Section 37 of the NDPS Act is attracted. As such, the prayer for bail of the petitioner, at this stage, is rejected. 2 Petitioner would renew his prayer for bail after the evidence of the seizure list witnesses are over. Thus, CRM (NDPS) 1387 of 2026 is dismissed. Learned Trial Court would, at the earliest, overcome the stage of consideration of charges and within a period of 3 months put in efforts to complete the seizure list witnesses. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)