APHC010676712025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] WEDNESDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4115/2025 Between: 1. MUTCHI SATISH, S/O. M.RAMANA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, RIO. D.NO.9-5-11, GOLLA STREET, SANTHAPETA, VIZIANAGARAM TOWN AND CITY, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. S RAMSUNDAR REDDY, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VIZIANAGARAM, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 2. SMT D KEERTHI, REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the Respondent Contemnors herein under the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for their willful, intentional and deliberate disobedience towards the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in W.P.No.11193 of 2025 dated 05- 05-2025 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K KOUTILYA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. K M KRISHNA REDDY The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO:4115 OF 2025 ORDER: This contempt case is filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of the orders dated 05.05.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.No.11193 of 2025. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents. 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the respondents submits that in compliance of the orders of this Court, the respondents passed speaking orders dated 24.09.2025. As such, the orders dated 05.05.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.No.11193 of 2025 are complied with. Therefore, no cause survives and no further orders are required to be passed in the contempt case. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner also confirmed that the orders of this Court are complied with by passing speaking orders and requested this Court to close the present contempt case granting liberty. 5. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for both the parties, the Contempt Case is closed, granting liberty to the petitioner for initiating separate proceedings for further claim, if any. No order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 04.02.2026 BSP 111 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA (closed) Contempt Case No.4115 of 2025 04.02.2026 BSP