[2026:JHHC:28673] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.8880 of 2026 ------ Anil Kumar Yadav @ Anil Yadav, aged about 24 years, S/o Tejan Yadav, Resident of Village : Salanpur Basti, Akashkanali, Post Office & Police Station: Katras, District – Dhanbad (Jharkhand) .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Kripa Shankar Nanda, Advocate For the State : Mr. Vineet Kr. Vashistha, Spl.P.P. For the Informant : Mr. Ayub Ansari, Advocate ------ Order No:-02 Dated:-23-09-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Madhuban P.S. Case No. 23 of 2026 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 2482 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Section 309(4) of the B.N.S., 2023. This is the second journey of the petitioner with the prayer for regular bail. Earlier the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner was rejected on merit by this Court vide order dated 23.07.2026 passed in B.A. No. 6844 of 2026. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the fresh ground is that in the meanwhile, a compromise has been effected between the informant and the petitioner as is evident from the affidavit filed by the petitioner dated 14.09.2026 in this bail application and the informant does want to proceed with the case against the petitioner. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that the informant has categorically stated that this is a case of mistaken identity. It is also submitted that though charge sheet has been submitted against the petitioner but no witness has been examined as yet. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 06.06.2026 as mentioned in para-01 of the instant bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-15 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State and the learned counsel for the informant oppose the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Dhanbad in connection with Madhuban P.S. Case No. 23 of 2026 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 2482 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 23.09.2026 Saroj/