1 GTK, J W.P.No.14822 of 2026 APHC010284432026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3548] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA WRIT PETITION NO: 14822/2026 Between: 1. KONDA NARENDRA, S/O.K.C.KRISHNA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.2-272-C, SOCIETY COLONY, MADANAPALLE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.522238 2. THE GREATER MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, VISAKHAPATNAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER, GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, VISAKHAPATNAM- 530017 3. ANDHRA PRADESH STATE HOUSING BOARD, REPRESENTED BY ITS EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PROJECT DIRECTOR OFFICE, MIG SECTOR 12, MVP COLONY, VISHAKAPATNAM 530017. 4. THE CHIEF CITY PLANNER, GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, VISAKHAPATNAM. 5. THE ASSISTANT CITY PLANNER, ZONE-II, MADHURAWADA, VISAKHAPATNAM. 2 GTK, J W.P.No.14822 of 2026 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS, declaring the action of the respondents in interfering with construction of the residential apartment building in the subject property of the Petitioner admeasuring an extent 968 sq. yrds situated in survey No. 14/2, of an extent of Ac. 0.20 cents of Yendada Village, Visakhapatnam District, as illegal arbitrary unjust and contrary to principles of natural justice besides being viloative of Article 14 and 300A of Constitution of India, and consequently to direct the Respondents not to interfere with the construction of the residential apartment building and the regular activities in the subject property and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the Respondents not to interfere with the construction of the residential apartment building and the regular activities in the subject property and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SRAVAN KUMAR NAIDANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP The Court made the following: 3 GTK, J W.P.No.14822 of 2026 ORDER: When the matter is taken for hearing, Sri Sravan Kumar Naidana, learned counsel for the petitioner, requested permission of this Court to withdraw the present Writ Petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, giving liberty to the petitioner to avail the alternative remedy, if any, available under law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA, J Date : 28.05.2026 RPD. 4 GTK, J W.P.No.14822 of 2026 12 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA (DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN) WRIT PETITION NO: 14822 of 2026 Date : 28.05.2026 RPD. 5 GTK, J W.P.No.14822 of 2026