SHAKIR ANWAR v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/237/2026 · 2026-05-05
Garima Prashad, Saral Srivastava
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2721 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2721 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 237 of 2026 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J.
HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J.
1. There are certain discrepancies in the writ petition, therefore, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the present petition may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh.
2. In such view of the fact, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition. May 6, 2026 Rakesh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mashaluddin Shah Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Garima Prashad,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Shakir Anwar .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH MEHTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad