Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2720 (GAU)

TEA STORE AND ANR v. DKD MARKETING

Crl.Pet./345/2026 · 2026-03-11

Parthivjyoti Saikia

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010048312026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Crl.Pet./345/2026 TEA STORE AND ANR REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR SRI NISHANT MAJUMDAR, THE THEN OFFICE AT MIDDLE LUMDING BAZAR, LUMDING, ASSAM 2: SRI NISHANT MAJUMDAR SON OF LATE RATAN MAZUMDAR R/O VILL- LUMDING MIDDLE MARKET P.S. LUMDING DIST. HOJAI ASSAM THE THEN PROPRIETOR OF TEA STORE THE THE OFFICE AT MIDDLE LUMDING BAZAR LUMDING ASSAM VERSUS DKD MARKETING REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER- SRI DEBAJIT CHALIHA, S/O SRI RANJIT CHALIHA, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT JAIN COMPLEX, G.S. ROAD, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-781005, DIST. KAMRUP (M), RESIDENT OF FLAT NO. A402, SWAPNALAYA APARTMENT, NARIKALBARI, GUWAHATI-781024, DIST. KAMRUP (M), ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR S HOQUE, Advocate for the Respondent : , Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA ORDER Date : 12.03.2026 Heard Mr. S Hoque, the learned counsel the appearing for the petitioners. 2. This is an application under Section 528 of the BNSS, 2023 praying for quashing of the C.R. Case No.7726/2022 pending in the Court of the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class-V, Kamrup (Metro) at Guwahati. 3. It is a case under the provisions of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. 4. The petitioner No. 2 has paid the entire cheque amount to the respondent. In this case, the petitioner No. 2 is advised to inform the trial court that he has already paid the entire amount. After that, the trial court shall consider his application and do the needful. 5. With the aforesaid direction, the Criminal Petition stands disposed of accordingly. JUDGE Comparing Assistant