MANDAPATI PARDHA SARADHI v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/35035/2025 · 2026-01-06
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 27197 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 27197 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010678942025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 35035/2025 Between:
1. MANDAPATI PARDHA SARADHI, S/O M. RAMA CHANDRA RAO, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, OCC- AGRICULTURE R/O. D. NO. 1-9, BUTTAIGUDEM, ELURU DISTRICT
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPT., SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AMARAVATHI, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ELURU DISTRICT AT ELURU.
3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, POLAVARAM, ELURU DISTRICT AT ELURU.
4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, FOR POLICE STATION BUTTAIGUDEM, JEELUGUMILLI POLICE STATION, ELURU DISTRICT,
5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, BUTTAIGUDEM POLICE STATION, ELURU DISTRICT
6. MANDAPATI MANI KUMAR, S/O SATYANARAYANA, R/O AKKAMPETA, BUTTAIGUDEM, ELURU DISTIRCT
7. MANDAPATI POTHANNA, S/O SATYANRAYANA,
R/O AKKAMPETA, BUTTAIGUDEM, ELURU DISTIRCT
8. MANDAPATI DAMODHAR, S/O POTANNA R/O AKKAMPETA, BUTTAIGUDEM, ELURU DISTIRCT
9. MANDAPATI MURALI MOHAN, S/O MUKKIAH R/O AKKAMPETA, BUTTAIGUDEM, ELURU DISTIRCT
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents No. 5 in registering the FIR on my complaint dated 15.11.2025 received on 17.11.2025 including complaint dated 15.04.2025 and to investigate the same against the Respondent No. 6 to 9 as illegal, arbitrary,
2
unconstitutional and contrary to the provisions of BNSS and consequently direct the 5th respondent police to take appropriate legal action on the complaint dated 15.11.2025 against the Respondent No. 6 to 9 and others and to pass
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. VUYYURU LAKSHMANA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
3
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed, by the Petitioner for the following relief: < ... to issue a Writ, or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No.5 in registering the FIR on Petitioner’s complaint dated 15.11.2025 received on 17.11.2025 including complaint dated 15.04.2025 and to investigate the same against the Respondents 6 to 9 as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and contrary to the provisions of BNSS and consequently direct the 5th respondent police to take appropriate legal action on the complaint dated 15.11.2025 against the Respondents 6 to 9 and others and to pass ...=
Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner who appeared in virtual mode and Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home representing for respondent State. Perused the material on record.
Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that it is a case of non- registration of the First Information Report and that the Petitioner challenged the inaction of the respondent Police for non-registration of the case against the unofficial respondent on the complaint made by him even though there is cognizable offence in the contents of the complaint lodged by the Petitioner and
learned counsel would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders by disposing of this Writ Petition.
Learned counsel Assistant Government Pleader on instructions would submit that after receipt of the complaint from the Petitioner, respondent Police enquired into the matter and it revealed that there are civil disputes pending between the parties and hence, no case is registered against the unofficial respondents.
4
Considering the submissions made, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Petitioner is at liberty to work out the remedy before appropriate forum according to law. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.
DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 07.01.2026
5
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Writ Petition No. 35035 of 2025
07.01.2026
Mjl /*