Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27193 (CAL)

RANJAN KUAMR SAHA v. WEST BENGAL STATE ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LIMITED AND ORS

WPA/14693/2026 · 2026-07-09

Reetobroto Kumar Mitra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

09.07.2026 9 sdas WPA 14693 of 2026 Ranjan Kumar Saha Vs. West Bengal State Electricity Distribution Company Limited & Ors. Ms. Ananya Neogi Ms. Anushka Ghosh .….. for the petitioner Mr. Supriyo Chattopadhyay Ms. Debosri Chatterjee ……for the WBSEDCL 1. Let affidavit-of-service, as filed in Court, be kept on record. 2. The petitioner is aggrieved that in contemplation of disciplinary proceedings, on the basis of a criminal case, he was suspended from service sometime in June, 2018. The petitioner’s grievance is that during the entire period, no subsistence allowance was received by him. Strangely enough, the application for subsistence allowance has been made only on June 1, 2026. 3. Mr. Chattopadhyay, learned Advocate appearing for the respondent authorities, submits that steps are being taken and the consideration is under process. 4. Let the representation of June 1, 2026 be considered in respect of the subsistence allowance by July 31, 2026. 2 5. The resultant order will be communicated to the petitioner at his address provided in the cause title of the writ petition. 6. With the aforestated directions, the writ petition is disposed of. 7. There will be no order as to costs. 8. Urgent photostat certified copy of the order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon usual undertakings. (Reetobroto Kumar Mitra, J.)