Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27183 (CHH)

TARA DONGRE v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/13992/2025 · 2026-07-16

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010532132025 2026:CGHC:30435 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 13992 of 2025 1 - Tara Dongre W/o. Dr. Pravin Kumar Dongre, Aged About 45 Years Presently Working As Lecturer E-Cadre, Govt. High School, Chataud, Block Arang, District Raipur (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Dist. Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Dist. Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Divisional Rationalization Committee Through Member Secretary, Office Of The Divisional Joint Director, Education Division Raipur Integrated Education Premises, First Floor, Pension Bada, Raipur, Dist. Raipur (C.G.) 4 - District Rationalization Committee Through Its Secretary, Office Of The District Education Officer, Dist. Raipur (C.G.) 5 - District Education Officer, Raipur (C.G.) 6 - Smt. Reena Sharma (Wrongly Mentioned As Smt. Reena Verma In The Order Dated 01.10.2019), Presently Posted As Lecturer For Subject Biology At Govt. High School, Chataud, Block Arang, Dist. Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. N. Naha Roy, Advocate. AMARDEEP CHOUBEY Digitally signed by AMARDEEP CHOUBEY Date: 2026.07.17 17:16:35 +0530 2 For Respondents/State : Mr. Aditya Tiwari, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Order on Board 17/07/2026 1. By the present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “10.1 Issue an appropriate writ in the nature of mandamus and quash the orders dated 13.10.2025 r/w. 26.11.2025 (Annexure P/1 (Colly.)), whereby the representation made by her has been rejected in an absolutely arbitrary and illegal manner. 10.2 Issue an appropriate writ in the nature of mandamus and quash the order dated 08.06.2025 (Annexure P/2), posting her under the Policy of Rationalization by showing her to be posted as Lecturer (LB) - T Cadre, contrary to her being Lecturer (LB) -E Cadre, in utter violation to the mandates of the policy itself. 10.3 Issue an appropriate writ in the nature of mandamus and direct the respondents to permit the petitioner to continue at the present place of posting as shown in the cause title above by declaring her not as a surplus candidate there in terms of meaning of the scheme of rationalization. 10.4 Grant any other relief, which is deemed fit in the circumstances of the case” 2. In the present petition, the relief sought by the petitioner i.e. Clause 10.2 is already the subject matter of consideration in WPS No. 7806/2025, filed by the petitioner. However, the 3 present writ petition has again been filed seeking the same relief. 3. In view of the above, the present writ petition is dismissed as not maintainable. SD/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) Judge Amardeep