Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27179 (AP)

Gondu Appa Rao v. Sri Lav Agarwal, I.A.S.

CC/2301/2015 · 2026-02-22

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010677352015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] MONDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2301/2015 Between: 1. GONDU APPA RAO,, S/O. TAVUDU, OCC: EX- WORK INSPECTOR GRADE-III, 0/O EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (HG), VISAKHAPATNAM DIVISION, A.P. HOUSING BOARD, VISAKHAPATNAM, R/O. H.NO.591, VTA COLONY, VIZIANAGARAM. 2. G.N.M.RAJU,, S/O. ANAND RAJU, OCC: EX- WORK INSPECTOR, 0/O EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (HG), VISAKHAPATNAM DIVISION, A.P. HOUSING BOARD, VISAKHAPATNAM, R/O. M.V.P. COLONY, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. SRI LAV AGARWAL I A S, VICE CHAIRMAN & HOUSING COMMISSIONER, ANDHRA PRADESH HOUSING BOARD, ANDHRA WING, GRUHAKALPA, M.J. ROAD, NAMPALLY, HYDERABAD - 500 001. ...CONTEMNOR Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased in the interest of justice to punish the respondents U/s. 10 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act 1971, as the respondents willfully, intentionally and deliberately flouted the interim orders passed in 2 W.P.M.P.No.23414 of 2015 in W.P.No.18114 of 2015, dated 22.06.2015 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. SRINIVAS EMANI Counsel for the Contemnor: 1. The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2301/2015 ORDER:- The contempt case has been filed for non-compliance with the Order dated 22.06.2015 passed in W.P.M.P.No.23414 of 2015 in W.P.No.18114 of 2015. 2. When the matter is taken up hearing, Mr.Battola Sanjay Gandhi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. Srinivas Emani, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that in view of subsequent events taken place in the lis, the cause in the Contempt Case does not survive for further adjudication. 3. Accordingly, recording the above submission, the contempt case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. ____________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 23.02.2026 S D P 4 290 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2301/2015 23.02.2026 W S D P