APHC010680962017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] WEDNESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1809/2017 Between: 1. M BHAGYARAJ, CHITTOOR DT.,, S/O M.GANGAIAH, R/O R.K.V.B. PET HARIJANAWADA, KARVETINAGAR MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP REP PP, rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad For the State of Telangana and the State of A.P. ...RESPONDENT Revision filed under Section 397/401 of Cr.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to present this memorandum of grounds of Crl.R.C. against the judgment dated 31-3-2017 passed in Crl.A.No.203/2014 on the file of the III Addl. Sessions Judge, Tirupati, confirming the judgment dated 19-9-2014 passed in SC.No.122/2014 on the file of the Assistant Sessions Judge, Puttur for the following among other; IA NO: 1 OF 2017(CRLRCMP 2890 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the execution of sentence dt.19.09.2014 passed in S.C.No.122/2014 on the file of the Assistant Sessions Judge, Puttur confirming the judgment dt. 31.03.2017 passed in CrI.A.No.203 of 2014 on the file of the III Additional Sessions Judge, Tirupati confirming the judgment dt.19.09.2014 passed and release the petitioner on bail, pending disposal of the above CrI.R.C. and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. D PURNACHANDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent: 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) O R D E R This Criminal Revision Case has been filed by the petitioners/accused under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, 8the Cr.P.C.9) against the Order dated 31.03.2017 passed in Crl.A.No.203 of 2014 on the file of the learned III Additional Sessions Judge, Tirupati, (for short, 8the trial Court9). 2. Heard and perused the record. 3. As seen from the record, this Criminal Revision Case has been filed against the order dated 31.03.2017 passed in Crl.A.No.203 of 2014. Crl.A.No.203 of 2014 was filed by the petitioner/accused to setaside the order dated 19.09.2014 passed in S.C.No.122 of 2014 on the file of the learned Assistant Sessions Court, Puttur, By impugned order dated 31.03.2017, the Appellate court dismissed the appeal, by ascertaining some reasons. Against the said order, the petitioner/accused herein preferred the revision. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that matter has become infructuous due to change of circumstances and requests to close this matter. 5. Recording the said submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court finds the cause does not survive for adjudication and the matter would become infructuous due to change of circumstances. 6. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. Interim orders granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated and the miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO Date: 07.01.2026 M K K THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1809 of 2017 Date: 07.01.2025 M K K 41