Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27174 (AP)

Sethu Surendra Babu v. Nishanth Kumar

CC/4072/2025 · 2026-02-17

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010679562025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4072/2025 Between: 1. SETHU SURENDRA BABU,, S/O. LATE S.VENKATIAH, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, OCC- AGRICULTURE, R/O.D.NO.L-82-H, SIDDAREDDYPALLI, MAHARAJPURAM VILLAGE, CHITVEL MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT ERSTWHILE KADAPA DISTRICT. 2. SETHU VENKATAIAH, , S/O. LATE S.NAGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, OCC- AGRICULTURE, R/O.D.NO.L-82-H, SIDDAREDDYPALLI, MAHARAJPURAM VILLAGE, CHITVEL MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT ERSTWHILE KADAPA DISTRICT. 3. SETHU SANKARAIAH,, S/O. LATE S.VENKATA SWAMY, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, OCC- AGRICULTURE, R/O.D.NO.1-142, SIDDAREDDYPALLI, MAHARAJPURAM VILLAGE, CHITVEL MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT ERSTWHILE KADAPA DISTRICT. 4. SETHU THRILINGA YADAI,, S/O. LATE S.VENKATA SWAMY AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, OCC- AGRICULTURE, R/O.D.NO.1-142, SIDDAREDDYPALLI, MAHARAJPURAM VILLAGE, CHITVEL MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT ERSTWHILE KADAPA DISTRICT. 5. SETHU SIVA PRASAD,, S/O. LATE S.VENKATA SWAMY, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, OCC- AGRICULTURE, R/O.D.NO. 1 -148A, SIDDAREDDYPALLI, MAHARAJPURAM VILLAGE, CHITVEL MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT ERSTWHILE KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 2 1. NISHANTH KUMAR, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT, AT RAYACHOTY, ERSTWHILE KADAPA DISTRICT. 2. SPANDANA, W/O. NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER, TAHSILDAR, CHITVEL MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT ERSTWHILE KADAPA DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondent herein under the provisions of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for deliberately disobeying the order of this Hon’ble Court passed in W.P.No.17926 of 2025 dated 20.08.2025 by not obeying the same and for his conduct in bringing down the dignity and majesty of this Hon’ble Court and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. M K RAJ KUMAR Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. SUSHMA YAGANTI The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE No.4072 of 2025 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioners stated that the order of this Court has been complied with by the respondents. Recording the said submission, the present Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 18.02.2026 KBN 4 09 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Contempt Case No.4072 of 2025 18.02.2026 KKBBNN