HARPREET SINGH AND OTHERS v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER
CWP/20337/2026 · 2026-07-08
Namit Kumar
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 27171 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 27171 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Harpreet Singh & others State of Punjab & another
CORAM: Present:
NAMIT KUMAR
by filing the instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of certiorari (Annexure P regularization of their services has been rejected
present petition with liberty to file with better particulars.
08.07.2026 Vimal
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-20337
Date of Decision:
Harpreet Singh & others
Versus State of Punjab & another
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR
Dr. Sumati Jund and Mr. Rahul Saini, Advocates,
for the petitioners.
Mr. Rohit Ahuja, DAG, Punjab.
Mr. Anupam Singla, Advocate, NAMIT KUMAR, J. (Oral)
The petitioners have invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court by filing the instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of certiorari for quashing order dated 28.0 (Annexure P-6), whereby the bona fide claim of the petitioners regarding regularization of their services has been rejected
Learned counsel for the petitioner present petition with liberty to file a fresh with better particulars.
Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. 08.07.2026
Whether speaking/reasoned:
Whether reportable:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 114 20337-2026
Date of Decision: 08.07.2026
…Petitioners
...Respondents NAMIT KUMAR and Mr. Rahul Saini, Advocates,
Mr. Rohit Ahuja, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Anupam Singla, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
petitioners have invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court by filing the instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of for quashing order dated 28.04.2024 6), whereby the bona fide claim of the petitioners regarding regularization of their services has been rejected.
Learned counsel for the petitioners wishes to withdraw the fresh one on the same cause of action Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
(NAMIT KUMAR)
JUDGE
Yes/No
Yes/No
114
petitioners have invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court by filing the instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of 4.2024 6), whereby the bona fide claim of the petitioners regarding wishes to withdraw the on the same cause of action VIMAL KUMAR 2026.07.09 09:29 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.