Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27167 (KAR)

NAGARAJ M.N. v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/7084/2019 · 2026-07-10

Ravi V Hosmani

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:35167 CRL.P No. 7084 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 7084 OF 2019 BETWEEN: 1. NAGARAJ M.N. S/O LATE S NARASAPPA AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS 2. SHANTHAMMA W/O NAGARAJ AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS BOTH ARE R/O JENOGOODU, 40 FEET ROAD, MAHALAKSHINAGAR BATAWADI, TUMKUR. 3. NAVYA W/O NUTHAN KUMAR N AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS R/O NO.79, 4TH CROSS, DEE ENCLAVE, KODIGEHALLI, BENGALURU - 560 092. 4. NUTHAN KUMAR N S/O NAGARAJU S., AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS R/O NO 79, 4TH CROSS, DEE ENCLAVE, KODIGEHALLI BENGALURU - 560 092. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI RAVI KUMAR B.R., ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:35167 CRL.P No. 7084 of 2019 AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY POLICE INSPECTOR, SANJAYA NAGARA POLICE STATION, BANGALORE - 560 094. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSCUTOR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. S D SUSHMA W/O N GOUTHAM AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS R/O NO 7, 6TH CROSS, POSTAL COLONY, GEDDALAHALLI, RMV 2ND STAGE, SANJAYANAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 094. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SOWMYA R., HCGP FOR R1; SRI K.HEMANTH KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH ORDER DATED 04.04.2019 IN C.C.NO.3606/2017 BY THE VIII ADDITIONAL CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, BENGALURU, VIDE ANNEXURE-K AND ORDER DATED 16.09.2019 IN CRL.RP.NO.522/2019 PASSED BY LXXI ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE BENGALURU (CCH-72) VIDE ANNEXURE-L BY ALLOWING APPLICATION FILED BY PETITIONERS VIDE ANNEXURE-J AND ETC., THIS PETITION IS COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:35167 CRL.P No. 7084 of 2019 ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for petitioners has filed a memo stating that during pendency of petition, parties have settled dispute and petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. 2. Taking memo on record, petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE AV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 26